Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail

Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Fri, 19 August 2011 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD4921F876A for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 05:32:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.258
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.258 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LwpTOQKlIby8 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 05:32:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F6821F8744 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 05:32:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7c47ae000000b17-19-4e4e581fd18a
Received: from esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id F2.BF.02839.F185E4E4; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:33:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.110]) by esessmw0197.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.87]) with mapi; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:33:35 +0200
From: Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
To: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 14:33:35 +0200
Thread-Topic: Use cases - recording and voicemail
Thread-Index: AcxSt/LlJmDEj2CnTU+w+vCeEkemKwLhqs7gAAVmnc0AAi5qgAADou9i
Message-ID: <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F245@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F16D@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se> <4E3AB4D4.4070308@jesup.org>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A238@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F242@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A34F@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A34F@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 12:32:47 -0000

John,
>> I'm less sure about that the recorded media should also be an
>> RTP source - couldn't you just as well send the file over and
>> then play it at the remote end?
>[JRE] Yes, the file could be streamed across, but there are folks who want it to get across more or less in real time, e.g., where the recorder is performing real-time analytics, perhaps in a >contact centre. This is the basis for the work done in the IETF SIPREC WG. The same considerations that require RTP browser-to-browser for RTC-Web also dictate RTP as the transport for >sending media to a recorder.
[Stefan] If you want to do stuff remotely in real time, could you not just avoid recording locally? Regardless of if the analysis is to happen on a locally generated stream, or on a stream received via RTP, that stream can be streamed to the analysing server (via a p2p-connection), right? (Probably I am missing something).

Stefan