IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] The DTMF API [Was: Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC)]

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Wed, 16 November 2011 07:53 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6091111E80F9 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:53:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.573
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.573 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3PmiHO1xeSI for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAE711E814A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 23:53:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE615CF; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:55 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to: content-type; s=mx; bh=sPqj6JqRuXnOMawL5T/1nPnzsLI=; b=ezWXuinzW FNVYQjI7XFWTiNOvqxu0HFt7JF/P4dM5qtq7XsO/WuJOl/PqUdmBnNFsjqzAUXJa GEcsEBb8RkmcIB4eez9ckJTh97VCn+ZFK6JHnudf23RxJKkatNjQ+LsiKc/1CihK Gp7n2f3VHT1dHRmNWuAhdjvmjKzQNV324Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; q=dns; s=mx; b=STX9Ir97ESf0B4FZ9K6x++v2cXGbfaDvVlUfzgwZMisNg4Qj JCwuqtiTYS5ak5itFZpyst2NihScimhQ4vb5GQjRrl4ZWDsY8kOP1iS46y+1LEDa 42X3QPcmoLToMc3bCoqIfMidIn1vprhCB8/DNWs9pqQjNEZsIG8LzjUTsfc=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E157FD; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A828E1672682; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:55 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AisIgQLTskMh; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dhcp-103b.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-103b.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.16.59]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 353151672681; Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:52:52 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4EC36BD0.8070504@skype.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:52:48 +0800
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
References: <CAOJ7v-18cNX8xussOPXSEoFxAARu8WriL8XgxPVUXBrWhz=FFg@mail.gmail.com> <4EC28CF5.6000109@jesup.org> <D666B5A5-BF2E-46B7-B97F-06C3736E8357@acmepacket.com> <CAOJ7v-3v5Zu9ZOuL3Qqu+aEDJ4a3cqH+oJ2yj_ewOpxKe=jA_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-3v5Zu9ZOuL3Qqu+aEDJ4a3cqH+oJ2yj_ewOpxKe=jA_g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030305040602040207020206"
Cc: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] The DTMF API [Was: Traffic should be encrypted. (Re: Let's define the purpose of WebRTC)]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:53:06 -0000

On 11/16/11 2:13 PM, Justin Uberti wrote:
>
> sendDTMF("1")  // plays tone 1 for 50 ms
If I call this twice in a row, are they serialized? Is there a gap?
> sendDTMF("2", 200)  // plays tone 2 for 200 ms
Same question as above.
> sendDTMF("123")  // plays tones 1, 2, 3 in succession, each for 50 ms
Does this put a gap of 0 ms, 50 ms, or something else between 1 2 and 3?
> sendDTMF("456", 200)  // plays tones 4, 5, 6 in succession, each for 
> 200 ms
How about this?

Matthew Kaufman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email