Re: [rtcweb] Making progress on the signaling discussion (NB: Action items enclosed!)

[Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:19 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <[e-mail]> wrote:

> 2011/10/5 Ted Hardie <[e-mail]>:
> > Hi Iñaki,
> >
> > The chairs don't currently detect consensus on how signaling will be
> handled
> > for RTCWeb sessions.  We don't want to circumscribe the solution space,
> but
> > we do feel that there is a need to have concrete proposals, rather than
> > broad statements like, "it shouldn't be in the component X".  Concrete
> > proposals for how it will be handled are the best way we see to make sure
> > folks are coming to consensus on something they understand, rather than
> on
> > rhetoric.
> >
> > If you would like to make a concrete proposal for how that JavaScript
> object
> > is constructed, what it contains, and how it is shipped around, that
> would
> > be great.   Without a statement of what those details are, however, the
> > chairs worry that people will argue (for and against) proposals that have
> > not been made.
> >
> > We await your electrons with great interest!
>
>
> Hi Ted, I'll very busy next days but next week I'll try to give
> something more useful.
>
>
Sorry, but do you intend to provide a draft?  It was hard for me to parse
whether the statement above is a commitment or a statement that you don't
have time.

regards,

Ted