Re: [rtcweb] IP handling: Using mDNS names for host candidates

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Tue, 12 June 2018 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B334C130E7C for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.509
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.509 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qrZdw3NvmUUB for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x229.google.com (mail-io0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F090C130E5A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f1-v6so682748ioh.6 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kPed5DChM9A00nB2JKbGKzr1x6XIbtUh9ZZ//JL05EU=; b=r9csTooq6qxodi68RQdp4wITzrlMNsgyIwa5/21oKsoPHmrO/Z2taSOQgZYTbALTmN ZxGZ5OZl+3sxAiAXfmnPtNZWxWUsTUQ8tU8cndM1fbfSJ4EeNP7WqF1RWF1LHYvAi8G4 lVokUOHhNFhZQzgf5781E/qhNHuee5HAzpzTryVoiMhw2OOzlMbnO7neEjmTurfLkP3b HjOxrSaD/0RYSq5q1uHB7WTq9iTvpap8+aL+OHix+vGRQbL4IsedlgIFe+nSsBK6idGS BgmeplDkeAHzVL2zSQ8nPCxys3xgp15EirJRdif497XVNJtJE3Es6GUab0TAXysdNdSV 4uvQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kPed5DChM9A00nB2JKbGKzr1x6XIbtUh9ZZ//JL05EU=; b=KcadZDG324oPjg55qNNrSBX14x/k0cAzamGrCX4RtH7F1eLlgp1DNubJSI0so+iCh+ PrhqUGbwKBVfdH9oRO/Z12+rICSvrGoJDbJf1gJUgLSNZ9gSTxYjYAwkZXbtMEluc5sH az5gyRppK52X4+vcTosQ21VOSJLD1VE+X+0YsqqqcgAsSKlLT8gR6HEYMNP3ZVzYQYGZ TqjVYUs+niScb/I9XOQoEWJ0AmVPeevILbj7+h0dTabZsF2uStQue/aNRjt5QOHgYCDh Ooxzjp07hafU07NPhB+iWhCF78/ZlAxAdNkv7oUW4ZwjNdiO00CmwE5+o1as7NhvM5Bh swFw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3o0HHMpJYzGnJMQ7yIOg9HGqnp5yDTe0l7d5++vqO1Ls/vw2XW OoNajgklpinL/g66EOloet3+9GntCKqI/I7wFxPBZybOcqo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLhZ4v4D5OZ6XgLA0KAHjYvM2wQSDm29mnFEnEx52JI/ovD/Meh69fytS44oxZGpwiqM7OIKviDChpeONV87cQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3245:: with SMTP id y66-v6mr1702888ioy.87.1528830873777; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:14:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOJ7v-2FQ3yfyfmFY8MT17nTFUvsNyixKuXXeT-Rq7zVQKBMnA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMACFhqucwx6pgQS7mqzJBcE09Q6HWFsUq5=BbstAQz+nw@mail.gmail.com> <14D68A0E-860B-4546-AA68-FD319A2FFAEE@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <14D68A0E-860B-4546-AA68-FD319A2FFAEE@nostrum.com>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 12:14:19 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3SHcmkDQtM8hyGcUg1N6uM1oU_0AOHtM=HERwRj9d4zg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>, yfablet@apple.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000027e1f4056e76ada4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/vukTbSJIA2Vby5Y5bjQB9RCLf6Y>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] IP handling: Using mDNS names for host candidates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:14:38 -0000

One option could be that Mode 2 incorporates RFC 4941 stateless IPv6
addresses, if supported. Otherwise, mDNS is used. This mode would never
include RFC 1918 IPv4 addresses.

This would work well in more environments and still provide significant
privacy improvements.

On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:08 PM Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> I’d like to point out that, while this works fine in most residential
> settings, it’s pretty broken for multi-segment enterprise deployments.
>
> /a
>
> On Jun 12, 2018, at 11:55, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 2:40 AM, Justin Uberti <
> juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> This is a significant improvement and I think we will want to incorporate
>> this suggestion. Is this something we could do as part of this WGLC, or
>> should we look for another option?
>>
>>
> Without having cleared this with Cullen or Sean, my personal chair-hat
> opinion is that we can do this in WGLC.  If a new technical solution is
> found during WG last call, I see no reason not to incorporate it.
>
> That said, I see two no-hats issues that will want pretty strong text.
> The first is that these are really UUIDs, not traditional mDNS names.
> We'll need text to strongly discourage the re-use of an existing mDNS name,
> since those can leak other information.  Second, we'll need text on what to
> do if this name can't be registered or resolved in a particular environment
> (not every network supports mDNS, after all).  Does it go back to the
> previous Mode 2 behavior, or skip private addresses entirely?  I think the
> right idea is "go back to the previous Mode 2 behavior" personally, but
> text on it one way or the other is required.
>
> regards,
>
> Ted
>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>
>