Re: [rtcweb] IP handling: Using mDNS names for host candidates

youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 July 2018 00:04 UTC

Return-Path: <youennf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34000130EBF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g6oXnjZrnBFa for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22e.google.com (mail-lf0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F100124C04 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Jul 2018 17:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j8-v6so118025lfb.4 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 17:04:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=D68IrX7YUKOtC9p+zpgLi7nj8sYPfbFFdIiygD+HCHU=; b=ecFfEUuYmB+53yaLBjtTVeyQ0LGS/bM17cr2/7xSw4Vt77Hw0uDLLiYaHECkIhydca sls/uej7RsvBRwqtcRHO/2PUi6RiEgtJwlyAtF+QeAkp328z/e/mpTke3ftm6dUqVYB0 KvetwLJVsYUlqPv2P5mXlaiwbuW0PEk1SO1p+kNyqJwbs/Mqv7eIyw3++PEdcQncCNzw 3aOZz2sk5Xtzp068QEJo9ThHvv85tk4EiYIyx2lIJwAIQfi9GNGnOmByoT8Esigtk6x+ 0nb+mpECEbY7FBQvMrhN9wwHaCjhNrUJQModiq1ekmuyLFqlTInFjNCyiJ7uVkyGylRE /Tfg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=D68IrX7YUKOtC9p+zpgLi7nj8sYPfbFFdIiygD+HCHU=; b=Be8tSgX+IP0RuxP+oh4l4MIqwLF3CyGeAm1zQN0RhSBer9st9gTh8+RhSttGjeqQOY NdZV3ikI0YCBlWYVgx5EF02XkMB73EwdzIxX65V9ceIJDf2QyJ980o3Z7HbZNm62E/9z Cn1Uc0BZBCnZMiOksq9i2P9o1AoMLiDSeRVwOm9KlLSjwde80LHAIhRvwXdsdMwSlfJu /RsB9x55lsnaT8IcruVAChVnZwX1dLqLfm79Fp4dn92dSSqMXDXYMpjFRlN02cE4abDM X3cJvdjaX7MzgiPlM0fRpmVjZQC472OqodA79++sU/ilkysbLL2YE9E88V5ZIzBcXowy 4bGA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E1jpugcydOgaym7qWsyCFmcyCtJ74ig/FYZCPdxThzfvfIQgTrM SlI3m35BkhoZ/qTE34HVhFgonBIHhN5JjsFhwHw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpd7/umDeqIf9HfqsS+QgcF48c4RgQDet9SbeoiZwQ8ijxn2owUDVNzUGmQ0AJWWNqcPNtnzk3dhf2aLQGa20QE=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:4419:: with SMTP id r25-v6mr18875043lfa.144.1530576289397; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 17:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOJ7v-2FQ3yfyfmFY8MT17nTFUvsNyixKuXXeT-Rq7zVQKBMnA@mail.gmail.com> <092e15c3-3ae8-5b18-1195-498f9cef1488@alvestrand.no> <CAOJ7v-3e8ytXd5NQLYdPyVdiSYDy4kGxQvbEh=_D9Mm0eSLmVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPcE_Lf5kVoMzid1+Vc=mhGuH9v7nqoSq=TYJE8W9FMfcggKJA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOSyuOP6E4dreJc_OoxMTqZg-N5J9Gkbp7ygrXQbFd-XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3vZH81m9DK9CNmEH3UKTBZT+0f1=uuQdz7ou2JXxeMsA@mail.gmail.com> <CANN+akbH54-05VceqL-rfq+ZURB85LxXFb4_B5KV_6KaLaC=+g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOCE2sxriCZs=iwe69=fcefa5O5bjD92TNe1q231oTNqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0KVPC8_FMBjfkqw+wJ6kM_N+pAs04xty=co+gU65CMUw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0KVPC8_FMBjfkqw+wJ6kM_N+pAs04xty=co+gU65CMUw@mail.gmail.com>
From: youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2018 17:04:37 -0700
Message-ID: <CANN+akYedps7LRoDUGx4zRN=GDAnCWNkg5u8RF2kWO3XK4RpOQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000803a405700d1062"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/wZNTv5OV6MIeO9PHFmD_HMIoCus>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] IP handling: Using mDNS names for host candidates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 00:04:55 -0000

Good to know that Chrome can do some measurements there.
>From the feedback I received from web developers, some applications that
care about this are games and applications like editors that exchange large
data between devices of a single user.
Some other applications like WebTorrent are less in need for host
candidates.

     Y

Le lun. 2 juil. 2018 à 16:08, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> a écrit :

> That's the approach we plan to take in Chrome. There is a substantial
> amount of datachannel traffic, and a quick calculation suggests that most
> of that is non-permissioned, so we should be able to measure the effects of
> this change.
>
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:44 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>
>> I haven't thought about it too much, but I think that I would probably do
>> is an A/B test where I randomly set clients to this strategy or the current
>> strategy and measured success rates, time to connect, and (maybe) some sort
>> of call quality stat. It's not going to be easy because I don't know how
>> much non-permissioned WebRTC there is in the wild.
>> -Ekr
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:06 PM, youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> A draft describing the Safari/WebKit approach is available at
>>> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mdns-ice-candidates-00.txt
>>>
>>> Eric, can you precise the kind of information you would like to have?
>>> Some testing has been done to validate the approach but I do not think
>>> this is representative of the actual state of the affair. Safari/WebKit is
>>> not gathering any related statistic.
>>>
>>>    Y
>>>
>>> Le ven. 29 juin 2018 à 11:10, Justin Uberti <juberti=
>>> 40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> I believe such data will be forthcoming from the Safari team. We are
>>>> also working on this.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:03 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It seems like this is something one could A/B test and measure
>>>>> connection rates. Has someone done so?
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ekr
>>>>>
>>>>
>>