IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] IP handling: Using mDNS names for host candidates

westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk> Tue, 03 July 2018 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2828131208 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 02:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jn5ivREJbl8e for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 02:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp002.apm-internet.net (smtp002.apm-internet.net [85.119.248.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34F8113123A for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 02:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 84201 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2018 09:18:36 -0000
X-APM-Authkey: 255286/0(159927/0) 455
Received: from unknown (HELO zimbra003.verygoodemail.com) (85.119.248.218) by smtp002.apm-internet.net with SMTP; 3 Jul 2018 09:18:36 -0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D026918A0587; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:18:36 +0100 (BST)
Received: from zimbra003.verygoodemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra003.verygoodemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id VbJdFNfOpJpF; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:18:36 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [192.67.4.84] (unknown [192.67.4.84]) by zimbra003.verygoodemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9BF9E18A01FD; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 10:18:36 +0100 (BST)
From: westhawk <thp@westhawk.co.uk>
Message-Id: <9EB00E21-6D1B-4090-B7C4-4C5ADA9E2D44@westhawk.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C18B8FF7-1B73-465E-B33E-8A983F0AE82A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.4 \(3445.8.2\))
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 10:18:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAOJ7v-0KVPC8_FMBjfkqw+wJ6kM_N+pAs04xty=co+gU65CMUw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, RTCWeb IETF <rtcweb@ietf.org>
To: Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CAOJ7v-2FQ3yfyfmFY8MT17nTFUvsNyixKuXXeT-Rq7zVQKBMnA@mail.gmail.com> <092e15c3-3ae8-5b18-1195-498f9cef1488@alvestrand.no> <CAOJ7v-3e8ytXd5NQLYdPyVdiSYDy4kGxQvbEh=_D9Mm0eSLmVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPcE_Lf5kVoMzid1+Vc=mhGuH9v7nqoSq=TYJE8W9FMfcggKJA@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOSyuOP6E4dreJc_OoxMTqZg-N5J9Gkbp7ygrXQbFd-XQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-3vZH81m9DK9CNmEH3UKTBZT+0f1=uuQdz7ou2JXxeMsA@mail.gmail.com> <CANN+akbH54-05VceqL-rfq+ZURB85LxXFb4_B5KV_6KaLaC=+g@mail.gmail.com> <CABcZeBOCE2sxriCZs=iwe69=fcefa5O5bjD92TNe1q231oTNqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOJ7v-0KVPC8_FMBjfkqw+wJ6kM_N+pAs04xty=co+gU65CMUw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.8.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/Hlah66_wpF-hhTisjdeeEKcbcD8>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] IP handling: Using mDNS names for host candidates
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2018 09:18:43 -0000

Slightly off topic - but if an origin was permissioned once but does not do GUM on this particular
page, which ruleset applies ?

> On 3 Jul 2018, at 00:08, Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> That's the approach we plan to take in Chrome. There is a substantial amount of datachannel traffic, and a quick calculation suggests that most of that is non-permissioned, so we should be able to measure the effects of this change.
> 
> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:44 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com <mailto:ekr@rtfm.com>> wrote:
> I haven't thought about it too much, but I think that I would probably do is an A/B test where I randomly set clients to this strategy or the current strategy and measured success rates, time to connect, and (maybe) some sort of call quality stat. It's not going to be easy because I don't know how much non-permissioned WebRTC there is in the wild.
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 6:06 PM, youenn fablet <youennf@gmail.com <mailto:youennf@gmail.com>> wrote:
> A draft describing the Safari/WebKit approach is available at https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mdns-ice-candidates-00.txt <https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mdns-ice-candidates-00.txt>
> 
> Eric, can you precise the kind of information you would like to have?
> Some testing has been done to validate the approach but I do not think this is representative of the actual state of the affair. Safari/WebKit is not gathering any related statistic.
> 
>    Y
> 
> Le ven. 29 juin 2018 à 11:10, Justin Uberti <juberti=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> a écrit :
> I believe such data will be forthcoming from the Safari team. We are also working on this.
> 
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 7:03 AM Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com <mailto:ekr@rtfm.com>> wrote:
> It seems like this is something one could A/B test and measure connection rates. Has someone done so?
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email