IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)

Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Wed, 07 September 2011 14:17 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8602621F8C5D for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.17
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.17 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.429, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NytmwZGhSbki for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:17:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (mx.skype.net [78.141.177.88]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F7021F8BE5 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 07:17:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.skype.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C6416F6; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:19:38 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=skype.net; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mx; bh=A5AfQ0AjmdiaR/ L9M2JlnHSSiBE=; b=t+5wvvJvfJbKEAlsV3sK7F7o5Q5uxUZCPbOlWx/bBvbmc1 4qc/TAEUhhqeztRHitRC8EgF39i9mFBYPIo5w6wvWl4iVB6ax3x+LGyqlNal2NMP Dk/rVuoKVXO2hr53W5iUU8nIb01eeD8/Hr/jEcVguHqhOARpaxqFTt7tvQytI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=skype.net; h=message-id:date:from :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type: content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mx; b=MSWmWdtX8ifEC9L7NblEs6 doeojE7D0W28kVebEJ7wBldqNcCkK1OM4AwzCrv+5401A8+tWLsjI1bxnX6bHRGJ TEkqOnVtzhdfCbgzpOEd9BBJv6HuIr3uCiLrv6XaaU3OZ4f9fqsoVepx9OaKExIp qjNZiRr35tzsnB3g4abfU=
Received: from zimbra.skype.net (zimbra.skype.net [78.141.177.82]) by mx.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145B0CF; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:19:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86EB35080CD; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:19:37 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at lu2-zimbra.skype.net
Received: from zimbra.skype.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra.skype.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBhnCQM2+Krg; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:19:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.10.155.2] (unknown [198.202.199.254]) by zimbra.skype.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D13AD35080CC; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 16:19:36 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E677D4F.8050105@skype.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 07:18:55 -0700
From: Matthew Kaufman <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0.1) Gecko/20110830 Thunderbird/6.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
References: <CAM_kxqci51=BnUFe-67Qs4eCxtGY50HDsRPrLjYULnBZJoH0Ow@mail.gmail.com>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF5106436F@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <BLU152-W72696F07F16816B1B267593100@phx.gbl> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51064707@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <4E659576.1000301@skype.net> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F0868@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <4E666785.7040409@skype.net> <4E67513C.3030600@alvestrand.no> <4E677CB8.40203@skype.net>
In-Reply-To: <4E677CB8.40203@skype.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rtcweb@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Bridged line appearance? (Re: Usecase & architecture: Browser application with separate webserver & voipserver)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 14:17:49 -0000

On 9/7/2011 7:16 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote:
>
> Whereas with WebRTC implemented *without SIP*, it is fairly easy to 
> build a web app that runs on multiple browsers from multiple vendors 
> and implements this.
>
> So this type of ability to innovate and implement applications without 
> going through the standards process is why we *definitely* don't want 
> SIP baked in to the browser.

And note that this is directly parallel to the "innovate like Gmail" 
discussion. It is trivial for Gmail to change the look and feel and 
behavior of the "delete" button to implement an email paradigm of "keep 
everything, search to find it" (and have it work the same way no matter 
who the browser vendor is)... but this wouldn't have been the case if 
Gmail were forced to use the browser's built-in IMAP implementation.

Matthew Kaufman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email