IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat

Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <helbakoury@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484B3C151076 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:50:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eTXvVRxoe2Jj for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x632.google.com (mail-pl1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::632]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2286C14CF12 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 14:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x632.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1e0d82c529fso48239175ad.2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 14:50:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712094657; x=1712699457; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=51Bh23maDBno/ql4tteMQyGeUjad6QKOlHsyk+EK9/E=; b=DTxBqQ6e5/ltNP2k9Sv0KaA2Oy66D1UEn93U7ZqLr/wuPXmHhDfIcu2rsNAc4Aew4e 9MEHJ4CyQGDjnq6VIMG6lyxBujJmoT5RGYajiKiyj87v5mEGRzWPDO5nxi9Guy7es4W7 uQzuaKohCno8xJwANKO2CCvnG+fjbAIpDfPoZRTEjKs9FJbcs6gsVWlj+T9arQA1v3O3 zh2pQaxrstczk1RIdkZYxdeCMzL2vaPgy8CoTN1S/70LudZPEXZTdvImY4ZzMHnVhrAO i+0jJ05YuXswTvfmob5g8o03g0dIbMoohSUJJBNgIzTt+MGFYWmKbCgWJg3MWJMedDze XMcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712094657; x=1712699457; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=51Bh23maDBno/ql4tteMQyGeUjad6QKOlHsyk+EK9/E=; b=bcebKsAeQ5d7aEX8tV7TkPwRm8ju6bUKcx1UMbCufzUIQ8Us3ErzS/QJIt6geLYiNg iSCVCB/J1YpQJM0yu0esBn45qSWecQkzRTSGUzXbOkaaOlgDQkSopYnfyPVVGpQ4SfST d524tnaoNj466Q61msgRPszDiP1zgsSjq82s22fXUsot7fAS4imxL2wTccHuIglDKb/p EbfiQZ+RmEjAzP/vPwdT2olVk1otCVM0qJmAsS81JjnWV0YnnvJ5nEbUe3nSZnXMQkYn C4kleu683NWV+soIFXh763zNCoLMGcNvaZUfUK3B6K4VKtE3ycnMBZNGYduPUtvenGdb 3ZHA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy+YZ4uFL1ndc/+7XfwW2dpdMmu2vUG43Yocn61MxX+54OvjHz8 rAukN5Noy8X8wKtKkt9IdPp7YO+G/+a0qVPwXV9bVQFcIaUNyABIWei6Xyrz4Be+MU0Vb+FpOXN zv9vMHyIgbMOQWrjrsJgoo2p8YATVrT64
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEvJDrx58TjQxxT+wY66G9g5L6qGq8oM7VaarREbeRmI/B2LDyitr2+Qw0KtdQw5Vt7VRYNClZxY5ol4ES1pjM=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:110d:b0:1dd:75c6:faa7 with SMTP id n13-20020a170903110d00b001dd75c6faa7mr13927288plh.36.1712094656824; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 14:50:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFvDQ9p1gZJ9oFSBvPEFK5KbTGz1-QD0BqQJy_D6Q=58w6K0pA@mail.gmail.com> <65A5C87A-7F22-4582-9492-766BCC1C74ED@gmail.com> <CAMMESszNGaoL5kdP4=fNeav=re40du-CKf7VeLW_VH+Yn-vuxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFvDQ9q_YBVA_FMMGRObkaeBHGp1ks0t0JU+zR3C4swYiLfm4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsyYkGXGwc3enC4LKEsBi5tbz+R_mbpu2n_hsOKBBDDhfA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESsyYkGXGwc3enC4LKEsBi5tbz+R_mbpu2n_hsOKBBDDhfA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 14:50:44 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFvDQ9q8GH8Ox=BKwQGu70BZ1oGxtW1ZLvMScHQvLUkT_yOSSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7981706152419bb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/8S_bFHUQB1KffrczY1BzruPVcyE>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 21:50:58 -0000

Hi Alvaro,
My understanding from RF8789 is that it requires WG last call but not rough
consensus. I am also not clear on how you measure rough consensus?

I think the *sat-int* email list has satellites experts who can provide
their feedback. If this not the case, and if RTGWG does not have satellites
experts, then how we can make well-informed decision about this draft
without asking for help from external reviewers who can join the RTGWG if
needed.

Thanks
Hesham



On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 1:21 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> On April 2, 2024 at 3:10:09 PM, Hesham ElBakoury wrote:
>
> Hesham:
>
> Hi!
>
> > Can we get external reviewers to look at this draft?
>
> That's a question for the chairs.
>
> Given that all IETF stream documents require consensus (rfc8789), I
> don't know how an external review figures into that.
>
>
> Alvaro.
>
>
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 7:49 AM Alvaro Retana wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I have the same concerns as Stewart.
> > >
> > > We don’t have the experience or expertise to review the document,
> > > including the assumptions. This topic is interesting, but without the
> > > ability to review it properly, I don’t think this draft (or any other
> > > related work) should be adopted.
> > >
> > > Alvaro.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email