IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat

Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 11:56 UTC

Return-Path: <helbakoury@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23586C14CE29 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:56:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EnhpBodtKyhy for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAD02C14CE25 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 04:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a074187a42so4712155a91.0 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 04:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712145401; x=1712750201; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ROmsJVfqpMgWtvyCudKr90v8+kBBFc7WrukWrP4nPIE=; b=TdSs/i+b9MK+s2iPnOpNuicOZFcVCkg9ri2mJAFbCHvrRHP2kGfjj0X77mhUBhKO/P 9ZU45waIAz3MNRQGmvY7rrMu5QI93N/YRnfLPmSyW0eko7TYyZ3sEADSEqXGj4sYBM7P 6wspAyQXSQlYOWKAKFJQr1E/VTpx6P2yS66BL3UO6WupEO0rGs6XDrFV9UmSEABO3nR5 AeSMjcIKwuoOSv/+yBX3GWsITx+VDqmzoD2In+7WPBDjWzNP8e5O7uQ3147S+6NjksDy xTrmFhMNI7Q8wR8Zg3ueVs2dZZLsfFLqZ05NMbpQKXPHm/igTgCy3KgnHCoepjGzOQ1b EvjA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712145401; x=1712750201; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=ROmsJVfqpMgWtvyCudKr90v8+kBBFc7WrukWrP4nPIE=; b=awQKNHBufUmstv7m6ak2u6PXiUYXTkIhIAOT1Rhxgyp2hiytL/UJqUUDFRgmk1FiOv XzPvK6UbEbzqQ1BIEa8FdW4HfhYdFApJw7lbdHGZLygRM1zCZHk1xs6nd/jqaWBGDBwe 4v5dVU7QPw4UHZxZkh+/alpNzSvlrj6rdZgDJVdZ1Kd4Pxz7cUHE/HTzmefzP7er75Dy 0raxnIkP+Q8KcQztDR6hH9oer0B0q4C24w7kYADB5UkXR2yefbhkxCHSo9euCQFRxXRJ +WH2sxB6eGyRUfEezJFhAVywN3PA6FOrZhlxNhDu0xGK9ZLc29uIDQHmgBNSzk/B2nPa EAuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxXVjqh1qbMYvs9ZSSaApDvfVzEyt+6aJ06uFwsAPXhExxRP952 imUedcMI1OUmw+K+XSyGisFzYzA/6pb5pOWQ3omkycdQrAG/zV80gHof6MnJPrgs//ETU6Zm7Ae yXbuOifyV9pDl4ELKhhhxHGxEF5czQW6h
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlpnyesiGIIgL0dBdo9/+EURtZ8LTE4OokBWjBYvNNYKH9jFVU8RSl1/M7Qy/A7cy2ElGRGaGzbBLNWZuN4pA=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ca03:b0:2a1:fa61:c36f with SMTP id x3-20020a17090aca0300b002a1fa61c36fmr12412385pjt.6.1712145400892; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 04:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFvDQ9p1gZJ9oFSBvPEFK5KbTGz1-QD0BqQJy_D6Q=58w6K0pA@mail.gmail.com> <65A5C87A-7F22-4582-9492-766BCC1C74ED@gmail.com> <CAMMESszNGaoL5kdP4=fNeav=re40du-CKf7VeLW_VH+Yn-vuxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFvDQ9q_YBVA_FMMGRObkaeBHGp1ks0t0JU+zR3C4swYiLfm4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsyYkGXGwc3enC4LKEsBi5tbz+R_mbpu2n_hsOKBBDDhfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFvDQ9q8GH8Ox=BKwQGu70BZ1oGxtW1ZLvMScHQvLUkT_yOSSg@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESswF0uyANJNFcTjwm5P2hUdX2HYYnnekog-F9N2t_WknRg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswF0uyANJNFcTjwm5P2hUdX2HYYnnekog-F9N2t_WknRg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 04:56:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFvDQ9rjV2knx2X7gKCMevoLDiegOGWKPheuA3w4p2phMGVBEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c961106152feac7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/Psdy9r8AwB_BlQ-5aG0KpiNHqVo>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:56:42 -0000

Thanks Alvaro.
Heshan

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024, 4:54 AM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Replying because you directred the question to me…but these are questions
> for the chairs.
>
> On April 2, 2024 at 5:50:57 PM, Hesham ElBakoury (helbakoury@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alvaro,
> My understanding from RF8789 is that it requires WG last call but not
> rough consensus. I am also not clear on how you measure rough consensus?
>
> I think the *sat-int* email list has satellites experts who can provide
> their feedback. If this not the case, and if RTGWG does not have satellites
> experts, then how we can make well-informed decision about this draft
> without asking for help from external reviewers who can join the RTGWG if
> needed.
>
> Thanks
> Hesham
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 1:21 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On April 2, 2024 at 3:10:09 PM, Hesham ElBakoury wrote:
>>
>> Hesham:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> > Can we get external reviewers to look at this draft?
>>
>> That's a question for the chairs.
>>
>> Given that all IETF stream documents require consensus (rfc8789), I
>> don't know how an external review figures into that.
>>
>>
>> Alvaro.
>>
>>
>> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 7:49 AM Alvaro Retana wrote:
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > I have the same concerns as Stewart.
>> > >
>> > > We don’t have the experience or expertise to review the document,
>> > > including the assumptions. This topic is interesting, but without the
>> > > ability to review it properly, I don’t think this draft (or any other
>> > > related work) should be adopted.
>> > >
>> > > Alvaro.
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email