IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC32AC151068 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XoUxkygy0Rpo for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51F48C151066 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a1fdcc3659so4117883a91.2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:21:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712089269; x=1712694069; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=qp91NB0Mnjn1+JzPH1jtsNSoSHN+ypHVvsZxRIvCznI=; b=DI714VpfxULttFzMAW5MNJOqJ4lEhcpHp/9e5ZOHxGW4tm+mAGhcSXiu5jpcFkoKjE vo3dxYymTyicrSMkG82k8cC6pe0U/+8E6L+9RaWusZ3x4WiSG5opYYuwOw/QXB1qgtDQ IN82qAAXCyaCEk3hBYfoPRJJFjrF9U5tGO/S4iz1onx2WS2twF1VfZa61e9iIDceklfb ZSnVWABJZLnLVVYAIDEwlRgIiAmxYbvLYLB0wl3h/KOlHNGuGMTCrl75WQ7DdU4VDXAN s3JEfa1gg0RJHkwF3w/l3gxg8ggdvKiexkaOw4EwuleJGoTnmpYCygfPWo34sa+QhQgV INPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712089269; x=1712694069; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qp91NB0Mnjn1+JzPH1jtsNSoSHN+ypHVvsZxRIvCznI=; b=Mdu6ZGiTlMKeZuD39d+PTSN/Uzg9PcKIgZNNvq24caVkZtUw+wjS1ZgwvhOuURlsx8 LuAAMExw6758BxK0NAqHKFqq7wcjSs1kor9DvUUfojx4B+PJWLPY/rZ6pbO7SAljBu/s clsU+TK3hGzd9tpcYsE1y9xtZCZUdMEsZbmIojLe/njJ0hmlMGXQFyZqU1bKUgW+qbZi fUrQtltOxJwIH6+r4Wkjq3ksXelumkTaAwzhwdlTJ6CtcMl35FFfLi63oJJGmI5btJnO r9IS03aLQ0KuAdbaRJ4qGXm+iMDKGEr7jh1lnyzE0Coq9+Rph+DAC38tYtGY1bqO8YcL FLAw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwijXDC51r3iNicpWFJwvpnyxhbntoMKX+umJ2Wfuyl2zO4TxNV Fz+dF+VcY7+jRYuwWZWLGbBj21TF7oF7/gNAzRT3tZxR8JsJFkQcfkqatc70BW7C+dKY5rymGpE bhc/GWaqm9OWQ/XesL5MUGO7WqlQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEM7YvgMsyjtnFb1wPZuzaGg/zdZZ2Fd/U9qpTyUy5GhWEqWlmFjQG7OmvCUTii/tRQo4A/AkV/TgdrRq8JO8o=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:3141:b0:29c:7620:6fde with SMTP id ip1-20020a17090b314100b0029c76206fdemr11485702pjb.36.1712089268665; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:21:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 13:20:53 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFvDQ9q_YBVA_FMMGRObkaeBHGp1ks0t0JU+zR3C4swYiLfm4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAFvDQ9p1gZJ9oFSBvPEFK5KbTGz1-QD0BqQJy_D6Q=58w6K0pA@mail.gmail.com> <65A5C87A-7F22-4582-9492-766BCC1C74ED@gmail.com> <CAMMESszNGaoL5kdP4=fNeav=re40du-CKf7VeLW_VH+Yn-vuxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFvDQ9q_YBVA_FMMGRObkaeBHGp1ks0t0JU+zR3C4swYiLfm4Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 13:20:53 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsyYkGXGwc3enC4LKEsBi5tbz+R_mbpu2n_hsOKBBDDhfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat
To: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
Cc: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/co1hPPLVIxhC1TfQx_bCiBHfZKI>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 20:21:16 -0000

On April 2, 2024 at 3:10:09 PM, Hesham ElBakoury wrote:

Hesham:

Hi!

> Can we get external reviewers to look at this draft?

That's a question for the chairs.

Given that all IETF stream documents require consensus (rfc8789), I
don't know how an external review figures into that.


Alvaro.


> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 7:49 AM Alvaro Retana wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have the same concerns as Stewart.
> >
> > We don’t have the experience or expertise to review the document,
> > including the assumptions. This topic is interesting, but without the
> > ability to review it properly, I don’t think this draft (or any other
> > related work) should be adopted.
> >
> > Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email