IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat

Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <helbakoury@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443D0C14CEFD for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sJyqkNqTUInI for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 770D6C14F681 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 12:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2a209b8af12so3781168a91.3 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:10:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712085008; x=1712689808; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dqOuW7IjZqVsiP52sa+Uhox+0ikQz39AwgSIprvIzHI=; b=ik44IWQG7YcrqhSh1JukBHSg3ebjtYND01udcGFp/5T0LfOa3azUTx47SyPnjmyOr/ dznqOUaulG8Iuy9kL1VSzfxlArhUAfTlBVaSdQsRFykMLKb1gL2Y+LpBHFQsj0m+lmwn JGnDVSuOk3JOnUAzVnx+pkqAfoagRAHr1yFwhHRVQZFvH9pAcrsMDA6i0yd3/n8J0L47 h1NetLbK0qcupIPVs9cBPXBwTSJ8NBgn0BL/ebYNovG2TTrC3wcCFqo3azm73SPxcv69 sBS7ngwGUVb07zJ09DOdbF8Vo0cZj2E/2PGEUfwAqI+MPztW45qr+Hs/DNi64bErYjSr A4DA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712085008; x=1712689808; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=dqOuW7IjZqVsiP52sa+Uhox+0ikQz39AwgSIprvIzHI=; b=Z0ZS9FgLwvEQbCagDEjPkBpdyHrJwnMn9MO6JgG/9lBDZrH7+VHlJuUCms6vj0i9FQ 7Ms6hdQrsnwNXsZInMPAzseiHTIyEys2fQQrgCCcc18MF9TescNCjGg3b3cU2xibCRkW sKPRdKfAiMNFxuUW410FhKDw5iUXS7TvBLmazDKF9VU1FNmp/+FL3eOyJLh68paRGXAB krLZpiOYG33ExYQMbpERFiB1RNDzm4lbX7nzIROeh/Rlx9kaRYytbgFcRdey5ZcvhjzO 54Gbn3cfZASTVWXCbXUBPzgbcBtKWEpdSbzJ7Jo9K4zYjsBaYKZKqA9lFgTgQOC2a5/M VVmQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzsDRS+z9LTPqtx+By/TL6G/EiCOQi+wakoWiPxRG5sjBw+wXQ5 1qiGCsjf/nBExIlC4s53vi4YByKim0VupInq85vYv0h1H1z2PJmHG32EdASua3V8oK8KQjalJ9D XRHnG+VOd41oIKy+r2fmoNPkGPmFdfJcl
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGmY5Q2iaHMj8CnB5JFB3F9xH/fr+kUR61rL6cGs9AmswBfGdkQfEYX1PCJTX7KV73lInm8lWYitvikkEtsUFY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:dc05:b0:2a0:4de8:875f with SMTP id i5-20020a17090adc0500b002a04de8875fmr12681310pjv.8.1712085008546; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:10:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFvDQ9p1gZJ9oFSBvPEFK5KbTGz1-QD0BqQJy_D6Q=58w6K0pA@mail.gmail.com> <65A5C87A-7F22-4582-9492-766BCC1C74ED@gmail.com> <CAMMESszNGaoL5kdP4=fNeav=re40du-CKf7VeLW_VH+Yn-vuxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESszNGaoL5kdP4=fNeav=re40du-CKf7VeLW_VH+Yn-vuxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 12:09:56 -0700
Message-ID: <CAFvDQ9q_YBVA_FMMGRObkaeBHGp1ks0t0JU+zR3C4swYiLfm4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c28306061521da96"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/9FR1Rfb8d_9QdVre1DYZunjt7EA>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 19:10:13 -0000

Hi Alvaro,
Can we get external reviewers to look at this draft?

Hesham

On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 7:49 AM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I have the same concerns as Stewart.
>
> We don’t have the experience or expertise to review the document,
> including the assumptions. This topic is interesting, but without the
> ability to review it properly, I don’t think this draft (or any other
> related work) should be adopted.
>
> Alvaro.
>
> On April 2, 2024 at 3:00:36 AM, Stewart Bryant (stewart.bryant@gmail.com)
> wrote:
>
> I support as a technical solution, but have reservations as to whether
> this will be deployed. Is there operator or regulator support for this
> approach.
>
> Stewart
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email