IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 02 April 2024 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A05C14F71B for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 07:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UdwpZYbs-9Bd for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 07:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D663C14F6FE for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 07:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-5d8b887bb0cso4263826a12.2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 07:49:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712069367; x=1712674167; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PFwchvg5kE9mTkqm6Kv9DWTeudpxJLUXKRkH0InRXow=; b=mfWtUzuK5KdYutuc7/7um8We9RD9MMmCCkxmpQ/ld5Wh5Ss7BruU3RD+/FrNc0b8i7 IOUW9+QaoFLbgDVoq9A9ezLtGEAd8hhDxguFt0J2ww2QvJxdGKk2LGIrSN7cyIZ5hl+s iAIScY889Mol+Nc0DHASCzO0iOUIlmxG8+WdSFSlkX3NCqpsxy/bfBNPxBXRBiQpe91X zBqUbiiwGP/8WKtgJFVDv/qiP3cPUP6KUinabiN9ED78UkekSBcfTd+z1s8ZY1QWUea5 Zu3cMFocQNUqo9EYEjFATjjMwqc4Wm9qEEYf1G25Aso75nyXhscXadvbKl0sPyIjtCVc kJCw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712069367; x=1712674167; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PFwchvg5kE9mTkqm6Kv9DWTeudpxJLUXKRkH0InRXow=; b=MWT2rUel6XWZ2oqCtcfY2Q1KNMOlyPB5cqcW1YBJvZWjLSEejLzdCPD/3J9y2hgCyF 3zi2L4TJyE7pW07iuPZdZkrXoN83Li9MjkkQnF3YulmFjL6VzJdcvj2MmvP1isIpL7S3 GjMOuBiqdCYTWdz55b5r6mK0MSh385pwK4p9lGtAOmuOeyMuU1U+eePkU8yULsT5ujdh Mxp6H48yyxKmEkg1bxdBA7syC4Acp1nruEawVT9AJJ3Q07zZZvEygAERl1HzsBPIYjJR OYPcRl7EmX44s6nil2+pvPuRhI074YqwKA9G3g84d8vHbkrld3ZJG08xMwIOqvqX5/bm AC4Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz9esX5n1y05rGUMgFHH1cxSEJ7DO/TCOgmqTjy2d/TPcDFWMl9 r8jWzjb+kgMl52GYwx3AlIvoZUoFwZcbKl8w5Mn7sc/PX8BFVL4Q5J3PAuqEp2wNDhTFgDNzNyg I/oDvwDjhr4pzLaQ4UmWNuRLJ+mV9MTTQ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFdIsGNzaXrlcVpYZSi6nFPy/dYUoWSzyrY+dCHyDyOUl/S7VgNGi7wQdu4irfg0sAZO7RU1QGw/mAdZC15F+k=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:887:b0:29b:2d64:68e5 with SMTP id v7-20020a17090a088700b0029b2d6468e5mr12707183pjc.31.1712069367319; Tue, 02 Apr 2024 07:49:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 07:49:26 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <65A5C87A-7F22-4582-9492-766BCC1C74ED@gmail.com>
References: <CAFvDQ9p1gZJ9oFSBvPEFK5KbTGz1-QD0BqQJy_D6Q=58w6K0pA@mail.gmail.com> <65A5C87A-7F22-4582-9492-766BCC1C74ED@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 07:49:26 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESszNGaoL5kdP4=fNeav=re40du-CKf7VeLW_VH+Yn-vuxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000078588906151e36e8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/fmorbIjv1rsyAo1NNGFcFHFLWZk>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 14:49:30 -0000

Hi!

I have the same concerns as Stewart.

We don’t have the experience or expertise to review the document, including
the assumptions. This topic is interesting, but without the ability to
review it properly, I don’t think this draft (or any other related work)
should be adopted.

Alvaro.

On April 2, 2024 at 3:00:36 AM, Stewart Bryant (stewart.bryant@gmail.com)
wrote:

I support as a technical solution, but have reservations as to whether this
will be deployed. Is there operator or regulator support for this approach.

Stewart

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email