IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Wed, 03 April 2024 10:43 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78FB6C14F600 for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:43:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qUey0d8qpqKF for <rtgwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:43:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72F9CC14CE33 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 03:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-34339f01cd2so3770074f8f.2 for <rtgwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 03:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1712140981; x=1712745781; darn=ietf.org; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oQ441xnaNqdMOlsgJuekjnCellwDLaVhAYrgnfuudCI=; b=W45BYqB3BnOlF3FLG5jatygKDmshvFB95vrMpai/6IGTFo3gU1RMfnivybHRc6F8/m JJH7JbzRO1PJnMjF+AOTTzEzKsQf5iW4rQUFetJv4p/Y+VrNyt7i+goCJ8ZthVbKQMbc oKZ0B6i8G7GJFusaRwObIbR8qh+sDSYrbKD3S0jA4jRlAFGa0JodSZBK7Cst0M+Y2w9K 4kiCDz36NSmc7a49QNn7wZLVn+DmpFh577gqNLLZBaRTvG+LKeUsG6Uhlvv+L08i7d1K Mv9V7LKGQ33xpM+CFm737V86b49lzHGZd3ZUUzu0jw7E0viZyJ7k/hIvnDenaEPtvTra ttKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1712140981; x=1712745781; h=references:to:cc:in-reply-to:date:subject:mime-version:message-id :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=oQ441xnaNqdMOlsgJuekjnCellwDLaVhAYrgnfuudCI=; b=WcBpxLyY1JKL7leBC0vpuQ3gXncZplT0XSHJjPxm41bumRuAy2ZLoKNESlO7ULu2hL nMjmt8COjCZHlC7bvRZrchr36Mf7vLZ50YQHSNZLglUy/dAKkp6MQlQLKVq+4oxPpoEg LgpCgyOSOp9yYshREP6Lff8a3oUah0nkoeBTnLvZmpAtDSKjo45A16NvPMEW7wj/XQZi kCuJ9OKHBlXdIm4zoIexoXvavTKE7ZvHYhIUduQ02vGk5hybbKddMnlbjMrrIweCqbIC ZAThP3Hpqkp+KQfTJ/1KeU2iGj0Svdh32Q8x/WiPW/YZUYY9BEJ1Oi2O6CQlca896CMt vs9g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyX4m338n4qX/vjnyL7PA7GGMwK7zpEj3gvS+LJRvMCnJhtIbVs 3HTdKc+1OY7jhOVumQgx+bkJWhIBoZccW/5PrnmwlIjo6MZoyOQyb2PEPv79VmE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFJF/L9dRB5lzFbRl6MnvwT4Qj55MTaxKLUDRnE+/BgjXd9WucjaeN9mqVFd9gHAhKQH2l8GA==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4812:0:b0:343:72d3:8bf9 with SMTP id l18-20020a5d4812000000b0034372d38bf9mr1454184wrq.47.1712140980498; Wed, 03 Apr 2024 03:43:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([185.69.144.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ay26-20020a5d6f1a000000b0034355b7e995sm5956681wrb.13.2024.04.03.03.42.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 Apr 2024 03:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <A47023D8-0CF5-481B-A5C3-28A80F0906F2@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0C8471B3-EEFF-49EF-879C-AFA92D0E4FB3"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
Subject: Re: Adoption request: draft-li-arch-sat
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 11:42:48 +0100
In-Reply-To: <CAFvDQ9q8GH8Ox=BKwQGu70BZ1oGxtW1ZLvMScHQvLUkT_yOSSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Routing WG <rtgwg@ietf.org>
References: <CAFvDQ9p1gZJ9oFSBvPEFK5KbTGz1-QD0BqQJy_D6Q=58w6K0pA@mail.gmail.com> <65A5C87A-7F22-4582-9492-766BCC1C74ED@gmail.com> <CAMMESszNGaoL5kdP4=fNeav=re40du-CKf7VeLW_VH+Yn-vuxQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAFvDQ9q_YBVA_FMMGRObkaeBHGp1ks0t0JU+zR3C4swYiLfm4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMMESsyYkGXGwc3enC4LKEsBi5tbz+R_mbpu2n_hsOKBBDDhfA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFvDQ9q8GH8Ox=BKwQGu70BZ1oGxtW1ZLvMScHQvLUkT_yOSSg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtgwg/CLktvKlY-nm0jf_7QcfxnvuzIuY>
X-BeenThere: rtgwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Area Working Group <rtgwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/rtgwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtgwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg>, <mailto:rtgwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 10:43:09 -0000

It is not the lack of expertise that worries me so much as the low probability of deployment without interest by either a major operator or a regulator.

If this was an IRTF project I would be less concerned.

Stewart

> On 2 Apr 2024, at 22:50, Hesham ElBakoury <helbakoury@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Alvaro,
> My understanding from RF8789 is that it requires WG last call but not rough consensus. I am also not clear on how you measure rough consensus? 
> 
> I think the sat-int email list has satellites experts who can provide their feedback. If this not the case, and if RTGWG does not have satellites experts, then how we can make well-informed decision about this draft without asking for help from external reviewers who can join the RTGWG if needed.
> 
> Thanks
> Hesham
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 1:21 PM Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On April 2, 2024 at 3:10:09 PM, Hesham ElBakoury wrote:
>> 
>> Hesham:
>> 
>> Hi!
>> 
>> > Can we get external reviewers to look at this draft?
>> 
>> That's a question for the chairs.
>> 
>> Given that all IETF stream documents require consensus (rfc8789), I
>> don't know how an external review figures into that.
>> 
>> 
>> Alvaro.
>> 
>> 
>> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 7:49 AM Alvaro Retana wrote:
>> > > Hi!
>> > >
>> > > I have the same concerns as Stewart.
>> > >
>> > > We don’t have the experience or expertise to review the document,
>> > > including the assumptions. This topic is interesting, but without the
>> > > ability to review it properly, I don’t think this draft (or any other
>> > > related work) should be adopted.
>> > >
>> > > Alvaro.
> _______________________________________________
> rtgwg mailing list
> rtgwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtgwg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email