Re: [saag] [nfsv4] [Labeled-nfs] Common labeled security (comment on CALIPSO, labeled NFSv4)

[Nicolas Williams <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:45:06PM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> I don't know about TX, but it seems possible that someone might want to 
> make SELinux with an MLS policy interoperate with a different MLS platform 
> (note that this would not apply in the case of interop with purely legacy 
> systems, as they won't have NFSv4.x support).  I have no idea how likely 
> this scenario is, and I wouldn't try to accommodate this goal in the 
> protocol unless a stakeholder could make a solid case for it.

Well, here at the IETF we do like to have interoperable protocols.  We
ought to at least try.

> Note that we should expect interoperability between Solaris FMAC and 
> SELinux (i.e. the same security model implemented on different platforms, 
> like Unix DAC).

OK.