Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com> Fri, 05 August 2016 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <strazpdj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DE112D79D for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nNp57YML-uUt for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C16A12D785 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b199so210010708lfe.0 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 11:50:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LypkcgeSgDp4zCeaJJTQDXQmkt+ORGMhaKP1MB/SOXs=; b=THObys09YlO8Dwx2Wo3kpnZUlBAq4dDOa5Z8ellTJZGqgclGnkRjN+RBng4bMdx6Rr J+mHIg4ZZDOGlmLjavD0i4VxpEkWWogtzNjAtOZ7xByWVm0o6BQTgkGHV41P9JUMCUZp 7HEYyRkoDRBR8tWyYWqjBruG7BEK8TBQw+AARRGr4F2HP5SAQ0YeQuaCa0RsZjNzj3Oq 1QIX+D8Gu0VDbvWqEk3zoZYZajGsrHgVJMDBdVmZcSYo8/cdoV/tAmrU/C9ZZyJhgJzF MTq+B80NsKyYHdi1W2yN3lIVhCZ+4/skXS7qKu6mVzxKni5YR036AmjVNNJidEYCKTmN IiCg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LypkcgeSgDp4zCeaJJTQDXQmkt+ORGMhaKP1MB/SOXs=; b=goBO7Tj5Ev4K2u9Gb3zRXcCCvk7seXpBOg+6uwIGrhBDIvjIX1lKNbsOqW8ddD5TsD APksVaY4BPzkI3MXiApyn+lACZyHeYCPGiHfscG5gQk+V8y+mpTeDDhru1+VWGLaAZKc 2LaK97dealARavjJ3A9XAbmoq3u+ArM33vKlFNio2fx6ZhWJjGrcj+IgJelFVoj4ppYv gpRSP3FtU3jj1ASKcTV/7dvOlUxy0DY3iGTTo6ox6uicznOMv4+1o1lgzfOEReBJav0P od4Ii0fgcrl4kVCZxxy4yUWy599saJHAyNyDFgcvh/lr5HlYEP2TZvAfcixtHktrqYMe ogTg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouv6Lx1EiTKJXUsfkvY7CC2Wex6IAG/hpr+g8y+qdWGHFoPoavU4leU7ywfJvOxnz4A9prZHmm1QfxIfgQ==
X-Received: by 10.46.69.70 with SMTP id s67mr9750396lja.12.1470423009584; Fri, 05 Aug 2016 11:50:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.15.80 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 11:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR09MB1440CD914ACFCE85EDE855F7F0180@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <B7DD871D-ED83-4399-B7C9-AAC016969C7D@gmail.com> <0F989CAB-AC2E-4F0C-B158-480B4323ABD4@gmail.com> <CAM+R6NV4a1PZiBws2ODmSa+zvk52+vk3j+6Qogo2DPJ7SN_OQQ@mail.gmail.com> <BY2PR09MB107864DFA2670DC49390D7E5A5060@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <MWHPR09MB1440CD914ACFCE85EDE855F7F0180@MWHPR09MB1440.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
From: John Strassner <strazpdj@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 13:50:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJwYUrF=2_Qx953WcwhWds-E9ekHVzhD41Y2zQoVwNgx5_i0yg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Waltermire, David A. (Fed)" <david.waltermire@nist.gov>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114b15d427eb7b0539578993"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/7kviC580jCfY8e2fuwzKfuQyZiU>
Cc: Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com>, "Haynes, Dan" <dhaynes@mitre.org>, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>, "<sacm@ietf.org>" <sacm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 18:50:14 -0000

+1

regards,
John

On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Waltermire, David A. (Fed) <
david.waltermire@nist.gov> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> Dave
>
>
>
> *From:* sacm [mailto:sacm-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Haynes, Dan
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 1:55 PM
> *To:* Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com>; Adam Montville <
> adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* <sacm@ietf.org> <sacm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
>
>
>
> +1.
>
>
>
> -Danny
>
>
>
> *From:* sacm [mailto:sacm-bounces@ietf.org <sacm-bounces@ietf.org>] *On
> Behalf Of *Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 03, 2016 10:33 AM
> *To:* Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* <sacm@ietf.org> <sacm@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for
> draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
>
>
>
> The Vulnerability Assessment Scenario is a good capture of a problem that
> plagues network security experts. SACM can focus in the near term on
> developing solutions to address the Vulnerability Assessment Scenario;
> these solutions can then be built upon to support additional use cases in
> the SACM work space. Therefore, I vote in favor of submitting the document
> to the IESG as an Informational RFC.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jess
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> All:
>
>
>
> This is a reminder on this WGLC.  Please provide your input in favor or
> against.  I'm surprised no one has yet chimed in.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> This message starts a Working Group Last Call for the Internet-Draft ‘SACM
> Vulnerability Assessment Scenario’ — https://datatracker.ietf.
> org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario/.  Please send your comments,
> questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list until August 5, 2016.  If
> you believe the document is ready to be submitted to the IESG for
> consideration as an Informational RFC, please send a short message stating
> so.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Adam
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>
>


-- 
regards,
John