Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com> Wed, 03 August 2016 14:35 UTC

Return-Path: <jmfmckay@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D8712D596 for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v32AVrlRQzkD for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:35:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26E5612DC92 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p186so78464144qkd.1 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lIV2naX4GjCpJNTW99ASHmxnrKR/bEo7LxbhI+76c2Y=; b=MnaZOo3AN4clCIpKXf5RkvSW1qEqRQDYulb8WPXi3FCW6PcCvhHMzkD9S5FJ+Y2Tgg tyuNTtx8LcHy3TRY5enqLndP155Crckir0p9wz4nLa4U1agNK11lj+UYOfk3Sxi+2+34 QuWwgitTEcITFpKhMDLVA9oePLwx4GTamvLeAycrV1YUwZvGNKE1PJTDXt+MT5aG3Trb M0O9hlnPFmfC6vZ1+AECunqUQnU97DtIHka7LQmlonTWmKc2T0QgpVkzRVcfCtIyyDwF xk8k1iZhLPD9GBtUwuzWRxy3d+P3GS6FPY4gQo01DgHPAa60WIo0NpnHB/Um+X4/EBmB 8qcA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lIV2naX4GjCpJNTW99ASHmxnrKR/bEo7LxbhI+76c2Y=; b=B1eAdvAbwNE3kIzCilbwvAxv2Zs5AfCPuCO3IBaGPcLrnA+B3eEzwiplzDGD0EQMGi VRi36RBoOAODqtvzq3Gh7otN/T+tVK1pY2Mc1m/187TDO2tov6DlaQ9kb0zu0z+ePiDR YbybDTNxHDbQnVLaGUYQGBSTo/ZGOBeMeK988NnOQjgeq91CVz8Pnff5pfG3J3Cc9X+q SBNpRoEZWqRTyNj74/juFbK5BvHpQI7CR0565mHmZlcuhUrOxCQZIswwOdmaA8YbhbQU PuOJ8bbH5I77p2mhLcJUPNppBRFQhLYCwSyEpQ1/uxNArCmNa8EHJTuCfXhrjQw9BaMV 1C/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuvaToT67Mug+T6Fk4n0N7Ogkeg4SxnNjBHp28HHISAYM2xHFuZj7dCfKf+dP3ymficmFFjeDCSpN65iQ==
X-Received: by 10.55.95.66 with SMTP id t63mr234815qkb.139.1470234785320; Wed, 03 Aug 2016 07:33:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.22.51 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:33:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0F989CAB-AC2E-4F0C-B158-480B4323ABD4@gmail.com>
References: <B7DD871D-ED83-4399-B7C9-AAC016969C7D@gmail.com> <0F989CAB-AC2E-4F0C-B158-480B4323ABD4@gmail.com>
From: Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 10:33:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAM+R6NV4a1PZiBws2ODmSa+zvk52+vk3j+6Qogo2DPJ7SN_OQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0541fe1d923705392bb6a1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/TOo4lOrmUGUI8yj5Jf1OvPkNgbo>
Cc: "<sacm@ietf.org>" <sacm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 14:35:31 -0000

The Vulnerability Assessment Scenario is a good capture of a problem that
plagues network security experts. SACM can focus in the near term on
developing solutions to address the Vulnerability Assessment Scenario;
these solutions can then be built upon to support additional use cases in
the SACM work space. Therefore, I vote in favor of submitting the document
to the IESG as an Informational RFC.

Thanks,
Jess

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
wrote:

> All:
>
> This is a reminder on this WGLC.  Please provide your input in favor or
> against.  I'm surprised no one has yet chimed in.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Adam
>
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> This message starts a Working Group Last Call for the Internet-Draft ‘SACM
> Vulnerability Assessment Scenario’ —
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario/.  Please
> send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list until
> August 5, 2016.  If you believe the document is ready to be submitted to
> the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC, please send a short
> message stating so.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sacm mailing list
> sacm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm
>
>