Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

"Haynes, Dan" <dhaynes@mitre.org> Wed, 03 August 2016 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <dhaynes@mitre.org>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFE912B01E for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:55:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.486
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.486 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=mitre.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qHlKxY4iRtSa for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org (smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org [192.52.194.136]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A39A12D591 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 10:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id D2ED3ABC056; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imshyb02.MITRE.ORG (imshyb02.mitre.org [129.83.29.3]) by smtpvmsrv1.mitre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE58ABC05C; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:55:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imshyb01.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.2) by imshyb02.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.3) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:55:08 -0400
Received: from gcc01-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.140.19.249) by imshyb01.MITRE.ORG (129.83.29.2) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 13:55:07 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mitre.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-mitre-org; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Xsbovr6bHjc0YOnuCIsbc5oCuucX+/8BgDnVsTxYIDc=; b=j6xs9XEnhalY3TpE3VhMf9Gtzsj3lUwsTG70h1uR4nMcD4snepCoysbovbGZltkbAnU13TWDJCwus9mjIC56OLmeLXitqZXuyV8fnrW8ERTAIYzpT4Z1wDTdR0NcIWWc6wgaRT59gT+ZZnxgIPn8GaquOmezUbGi3wF7Rwd+qXg=
Received: from BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.166.116.10) by BY2PR09MB1079.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.166.116.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.549.15; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:55:05 +0000
Received: from BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.116.10]) by BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.166.116.10]) with mapi id 15.01.0549.023; Wed, 3 Aug 2016 17:55:05 +0000
From: "Haynes, Dan" <dhaynes@mitre.org>
To: Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay <jmfmckay@gmail.com>, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
Thread-Index: AQHR6NtcqVWjeMEakk27LKdp+cRBNqA0qx0AgAKrDwCAADhUoA==
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:55:05 +0000
Message-ID: <BY2PR09MB107864DFA2670DC49390D7E5A5060@BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <B7DD871D-ED83-4399-B7C9-AAC016969C7D@gmail.com> <0F989CAB-AC2E-4F0C-B158-480B4323ABD4@gmail.com> <CAM+R6NV4a1PZiBws2ODmSa+zvk52+vk3j+6Qogo2DPJ7SN_OQQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM+R6NV4a1PZiBws2ODmSa+zvk52+vk3j+6Qogo2DPJ7SN_OQQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dhaynes@mitre.org;
x-originating-ip: [192.160.51.86]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b127fb63-8206-428d-2d91-08d3bbc74d41
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2PR09MB1079; 6:W3eKOcjKQvU+Swe5uc6PUvTYRxhA7aG3scaqSkzvSmdF4nlcF12szF0cI3rfFL1bt+Sy5ZG4qWv037o4rVXkrELIPaz+7Fj4CG/Eu8hwp8kd8ZBigy+3IdfjM64/+w2cWeOsiQ3mcARPXbVFBZb0XUhXHT9GkVsA5bAHmG80RJJLSLLQs1lMJIG7FH9rrOnPlN8fV+Ft22vu1AaGHV0+BvNOLJhWNsRhWBoKJ8sq9KXuC9yKhrqV+QU0KXf/9O78HEKtpiM4UCX0TI8NcJvo+C3ukH7clgYHJQ8wKD3gAPPitZqns5Klfq2MkC3SLORzZsn8lOdyMT7TLOd8fG+tAg==; 5:ybO7nF7bZu2cmpm1xuJayc4QR+oGzgp4lRWijMFIYIUWLXZqgkd4qAYTUoHLRDxjjddg+CFsTgliAKgW/tQrdkuffp73s0KtuKPcKlG0cTuuD+dV0i6wQppqbvhfgqhhlj3F63P1PaFTtaDpM67Lcw==; 24:2eomg7V7VDVcLMaOh6FYaZUQE7QLyyAxvkUp88KlnHfsdNVKP3A32WRQUXShEgI0bWUKDLpjySwrqErehX3I1m6BMtjk/j2b95tNjNFPWzk=; 7:DpYf3DkIRBmFJ0V+DllIs8s4yqK+RXM3yvypnEIE/euNWypXD818c1oKY7SVKFzpvQAsEcNxqvjkxf6Ax0BSPvHyW2PbD+wJMYMT+HIfOfDaiQpOgWjXyjfJqMxwX1S7wpRg4mmpv1hJtAJ9tNGoyalY2J/atWZNQJcgSP4llh5Iin7yppxkmUYEV+Ih0CgdPLeaD08ZzIrFe+cANJAec0NpFoGaCBMIzJQNBuVI4fY/ys2LtAe57fQNBI3ugu0A
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY2PR09MB1079;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BY2PR09MB1079FE4A1DB42B6B6DB73916A5060@BY2PR09MB1079.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(120809045254105)(192374486261705)(21748063052155);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:BY2PR09MB1079; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2PR09MB1079;
x-forefront-prvs: 00235A1EEF
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(71364002)(24454002)(377454003)(106356001)(3660700001)(5001770100001)(106116001)(101416001)(68736007)(3280700002)(9686002)(7846002)(7696003)(7906003)(6116002)(102836003)(7736002)(189998001)(19625215002)(3846002)(15975445007)(790700001)(87936001)(97736004)(8936002)(74316002)(2906002)(33656002)(8676002)(19609705001)(76176999)(54356999)(99286002)(92566002)(66066001)(19300405004)(81166006)(77096005)(2900100001)(2950100001)(19580395003)(76576001)(586003)(81156014)(19617315012)(10400500002)(5002640100001)(11100500001)(86362001)(16236675004)(230783001)(4326007)(105586002)(122556002)(19580405001)(50986999); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR09MB1079; H:BY2PR09MB1078.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: mitre.org does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BY2PR09MB107864DFA2670DC49390D7E5A5060BY2PR09MB1078namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Aug 2016 17:55:05.4531 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: c620dc48-1d50-4952-8b39-df4d54d74d82
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2PR09MB1079
X-OriginatorOrg: mitre.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/B0V8nJ8qyWJ7Q52VaOlnREbjRJM>
Cc: "<sacm@ietf.org>" <sacm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 17:55:12 -0000

+1.

-Danny

From: sacm [mailto:sacm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 10:33 AM
To: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Cc: <sacm@ietf.org> <sacm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

The Vulnerability Assessment Scenario is a good capture of a problem that plagues network security experts. SACM can focus in the near term on developing solutions to address the Vulnerability Assessment Scenario; these solutions can then be built upon to support additional use cases in the SACM work space. Therefore, I vote in favor of submitting the document to the IESG as an Informational RFC.
Thanks,
Jess

On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com<mailto:adam.w.montville@gmail.com>> wrote:
All:

This is a reminder on this WGLC.  Please provide your input in favor or against.  I'm surprised no one has yet chimed in.

Kind regards,

Adam

On Jul 28, 2016, at 10:20 AM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com<mailto:adam.w.montville@gmail.com>> wrote:

This message starts a Working Group Last Call for the Internet-Draft ‘SACM Vulnerability Assessment Scenario’ — https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario/.  Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list until August 5, 2016.  If you believe the document is ready to be submitted to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC, please send a short message stating so.

Kind regards,

Adam


_______________________________________________
sacm mailing list
sacm@ietf.org<mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm