IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario

Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> Wed, 24 August 2016 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sacm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B3612D76A for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8L0su2a-3fNx for <sacm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:56:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980A212B02C for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x233.google.com with SMTP id c15so38094847oig.0 for <sacm@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=g/noPSY/hRI0Uf7LNIGc8ydNzofCrpRfXu/HC8caajg=; b=y5J5qmM+vHdN0SKyNr1qylyUO+wqfGGj3aXV46mWwYMyxD28flc70yrY8M7ud90ix9 L/xyttaV65BFyiGeQPf9uA9ZM9p2d0dihu1M0dAhzgPoiN3x1yfHD3Z/5TCwlNMbEVMJ eyzwxYskV10belfpMF/Y/NKVKfPVK7oYB0f05MiwZovgUpGxZ2z5pQBwyCyxWnlECI9M pgRoe0hMW+YwZ7NbhLj/AVoj/ROHSuivpNpy6XdAAJTAe0VOr5ekAgQzBHxGIisu4uEQ pyJDiFDuid83Uzc58y2HgYVlBAFss9oX2HXzdIbOafVxJ8eC81D24AAO8fHrDpSgAs67 L1sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :references:to:in-reply-to; bh=g/noPSY/hRI0Uf7LNIGc8ydNzofCrpRfXu/HC8caajg=; b=C6wIN6wm2Zjz6k9kw6SDHlOcZDUcNLzM/G3DfCLYbfNEXWjTFFzVoqHRsIpv66eAlA Dqs1IOLzImcGdzzK2nhMVDDSRVegOgWWTfCBEFYRZqfneLp6xl0CLmjjuiZJWxNellzk 03VXMjyyzZQrRpMcl4lpnvufMJO2SfotseJtQ2uFVR2Bygn1yA30Y0MPvDKxpKH/zf32 pAuzO8Mu5OpkOi4nSIFeBhX+eLVIoZOrViciGBvKXHFUwsEnOKTBvu44qNHM54JuycSs SHwEXgVa1ZkWUfCPH5/VCyctcxBK8uw0ztQ3K3boybgvnAof+nN33rSUpoQXdgbR4Jzq dXSg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouu7hT8OI69Gxvf9wMDeGKMwWRp++aqkAhTTzc+ToTpnm2wggaoSYzoFcmfGz+BbaA==
X-Received: by 10.157.54.243 with SMTP id s48mr4114730otd.33.1472068583889; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from adams-mbp.attlocal.net (99-64-100-131.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net. [99.64.100.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l184sm4805500oib.2.2016.08.24.12.56.23 for <sacm@ietf.org> (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:56:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_85DFB1ED-15E5-46C0-B6C6-9723A9C9D4FD"
Message-Id: <B57E8E91-8DDB-4E81-AFB5-2F893187CEEC@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:56:22 -0500
References: <B7DD871D-ED83-4399-B7C9-AAC016969C7D@gmail.com>
To: "<sacm@ietf.org>" <sacm@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <B7DD871D-ED83-4399-B7C9-AAC016969C7D@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/fTmBoVt4l-XzEN2lw-guOdC3-U0>
Subject: Re: [sacm] Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario
X-BeenThere: sacm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SACM WG mail list <sacm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sacm/>
List-Post: <mailto:sacm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sacm>, <mailto:sacm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:56:27 -0000

There seems to be good consensus on putting our vulnerability draft through to the IESG.  Henk had some terminology-related comments that were augmented by Jarrett.  The suggestion [1] was to change "Endpoint Vulnerability Assessment Capability" to "Endpoint Vulnerability Assessment Capabilities" (make it plural).  Given that we have consensus as it stands, I don't feel that we should require the draft to be updated, but the change is small, and simple, so we could do so easily.  Danny, would you be willing to make that small change before we submit the draft to IESG?

Kind regards,

Adam

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/lPHC95Ug2lQWTYC1HG5s2iMOYic <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sacm/lPHC95Ug2lQWTYC1HG5s2iMOYic> 

> On Jul 28, 2016, at 9:20 AM, Adam Montville <adam.w.montville@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This message starts a Working Group Last Call for the Internet-Draft ‘SACM Vulnerability Assessment Scenario’ — https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sacm-vuln-scenario/>.  Please send your comments, questions, and edit proposals to the WG mail list until August 5, 2016.  If you believe the document is ready to be submitted to the IESG for consideration as an Informational RFC, please send a short message stating so.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Adam

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email