Re: [Secdispatch] IETF118 - Call for topics

[Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[e-mail]>]

Can you address the following:

   1. pointers to ongoing/prior discussions
   2. pointers to implementations
   3. summarizing prior engagement with existing WGs
   4. summarizing who would want to advance this work


Regards,
 Rifaat



On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 2:48 AM Meiling Chen <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Rifaat,
> 10 or 15 minutes is enough.
>
> These questions are indeed helpful for understanding.
> We have two drafts for presentation:
> 1.draft-chen-secure-path-architecture-00,
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-secure-path-architecture/
> 2.draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-security-capability-02
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-security-capability/
>
> The topic of secure paths or secure routing has been mentioned in my other
> two drafts:
> draft-chen-secure-routing-use-cases and
> draft-chen-secure-routing-requirements.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-secure-routing-use-cases/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-secure-routing-requirements/
>
> There is currently no suitable working group on secure paths,
> but in WG RATS draft-voit-rats-trustworthy-path-routing mentioned the
> same requirements.
>
> We welcome all interested parties to contribute to the topic of secure
> paths, the secure path will be the specific implementation of network
> deterministic security.
>
> Best,
> Meiling
>
>
> *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[e-mail]>
> *Date:* 2023-10-23 06:17
> *To:* Meiling Chen <[e-mail]>
> *CC:* secdispatch <[e-mail]>
> *Subject:* Re: [Secdispatch] IETF118 - Call for topics
> Hi Meiling,
>
> To consider adding this to the agenda, please answer the questions
> specified in the following questions as specified in the link below:
> https://wiki.ietf.org/group/secdispatch#requesting-time-on-the-agenda
>
>
>    1. pointers to a draft(s)
>    2. pointers to ongoing/prior discussions
>    3. pointers to implementations
>    4. pointers to any other background materials
>    5. summarizing prior engagement with existing WGs
>    6. summarizing who would want to advance this work
>    7. desired next steps
>    8. desired time for discussion
>
>
>
> Regards,
>  Rifaat
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 10:18 PM Meiling Chen <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Rifaat,
>> I understand your concerns, although this draft is also being updated in
>> IDR, the new topic we need to advance is secure path, there is no suitable
>> working group for this topic.
>>
>> Best,
>> Meiling
>>
>>
>> *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[e-mail]>
>> *Date:* 2023-10-19 19:38
>> *To:* Meiling Chen <[e-mail]>
>> *CC:* secdispatch <[e-mail]>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Secdispatch] IETF118 - Call for topics
>> Hi Meiling,
>>
>> Please, take a look at the following link for more information on what
>> details we are looking for to help the WG form an opinion on this topic:
>> https://wiki.ietf.org/group/secdispatch#requesting-time-on-the-agenda
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Rifaat
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 11:39 PM Meiling Chen <
>> [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rifaat,
>>> I need 10 mins for my draft, we have new updates this time.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-idr-bgp-ls-security-capability/
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Meiling
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <[e-mail]>
>>> *Date:* 2023-10-10 04:17
>>> *To:* secdispatch <[e-mail]>
>>> *Subject:* [Secdispatch] IETF118 - Call for topics
>>> All,
>>>
>>> As per the preliminary agenda, we have a *90 minutes* session on *Monday
>>> *at *15:30 - 17:00*.
>>>
>>> Please, reply to this email or directly to the chair if you have topics
>>> that you would like to discuss in Prague.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>  Rifaat
>>>
>>>
>>>