Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016
"Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Wed, 26 October 2016 03:13 UTC
Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088DD129A10; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:13:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fV1OaYTVTPtU; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gcc01-dm2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm2gcc01on0133.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.201.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8C712940C; Tue, 25 Oct 2016 20:13:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nistgov.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nist-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=W2FBDfprEgc5rsgVR3UYsWg7xyNjmtJtHEJZ6MQXhak=; b=NOQs7pgYiWkK9UZ/Ptt45dhD7Y3tJM8mP6GvCfpdcB8CQPgzL2gvZtmVLDetqlc7L5gPp67FbRfjdMEmZIV02KZmw9kUnbactqsBwlLYaf0C6tOmZy6v6ySw0jbkSEOrxFOKjdluxyVlGQ0F8hXy1Ym2EFAmldSVEQlPRN+5W/M=
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.145) by DM2PR09MB0448.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.161.252.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.679.12; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:13:09 +0000
Received: from DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) by DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.161.252.145]) with mapi id 15.01.0679.015; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:13:09 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr-ads@ietf.org" <sidr-ads@ietf.org>, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016
Thread-Index: AQHSI8j/I/O4kS89i0qcRGjR216wO6C6JKNL
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:13:08 +0000
Message-ID: <DM2PR09MB0446D5E5310327B1766D6D4384AB0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <yj9otwcjnfkl.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
In-Reply-To: <yj9otwcjnfkl.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov;
x-originating-ip: [108.51.40.221]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1ed3049a-989e-4286-31e5-08d3fd4e0326
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR09MB0448; 7:zQQPc3NpDtPuAWS/YsZjKwjwFWttM28zKanlgCtCsbTu57L9P+XQQ8RvdXtXNuLN5zIERo9daX5hHtjub7+va+qcyRQ0W6qKnYpFDHl3AqIKBuYyO9QmTWWyp556eJJ8qCdju1cuyP6QmTevTIy9hVWTRLN9LorOln97RUmKoIra0ecIpZ92plMZ8eQw0BTL4KQGRvQDLy6cXbd33cKRBnMrk2twlctbIY+XnLJXdNJUv8ZFQtQz8ZVKO4eCDyc4seVC0CUL1RaYWkfaxA0xtrv/qv8aA9ZodtZW8OSLuIXghVtBL7zILu1z5DC/CI6Tp2YJ3U693OGXBWPZ0EbN1ExVRsy6UGQwVkOTIvy6tu8=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR09MB04488833BE61363036EC0B5C84AB0@DM2PR09MB0448.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(192374486261705);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040176)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026); SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448;
x-forefront-prvs: 0107098B6C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(199003)(189002)(5423002)(377454003)(7696004)(5660300001)(586003)(2950100002)(122556002)(54356999)(81166006)(305945005)(6116002)(76176999)(50986999)(9686002)(10400500002)(3846002)(2906002)(106356001)(105586002)(2900100001)(99286002)(106116001)(15975445007)(81156014)(92566002)(68736007)(102836003)(76576001)(11100500001)(5002640100001)(3900700001)(87936001)(2501003)(189998001)(19580405001)(66066001)(19580395003)(107886002)(77096005)(7846002)(230783001)(3660700001)(3280700002)(8936002)(7736002)(5001770100001)(101416001)(33656002)(97736004)(2201001)(86362001)(74316002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0448; H:DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nist.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Oct 2016 03:13:08.9111 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR09MB0448
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/3G7gUBKcw8ebX-e6ndDkSGhOoR0>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 03:13:13 -0000
I read the draft once again. I support publication. Found a minor typo in the last paragraph on p.15 (can be dealt with during RFC editor review process): s/the loss of on IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/the loss of one IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/ Sriram ________________________________________ From: sidr <sidr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:08 AM To: sidr@ietf.org; sidr-chairs@ietf.org; sidr-ads@ietf.org Subject: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016 Howdy WG folks! The authors of: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered believe they have addressed all inflight concerns/comments, the request is to WGLC this, consider it's place in the world and if appropriate pass this document along to the IESG for publication. The abstract for this draft is: "This document proposes an update to the certificate validation procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while retaining essential security features." Let's have a read through, consider and reply with your thoughts please, this WGLC is set to expire: 10/25/2016 - October 25, 2016. thanks for reading/replying/thinking! -chris co-chair-persona _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
- [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-rec… Chris Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Declan Ma
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Christopher Morrow
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Sean Turner
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Sean Turner
- Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation… Tim Bruijnzeels