IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> Wed, 26 October 2016 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60BD12965D; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:32:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.331
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.331 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.431] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4JKgVfPv6Cte; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mahimahi.ripe.net (mahimahi.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1372]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9588012960A; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10]) by mahimahi.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1bzQC1-00032r-WB; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:32:45 +0200
Received: from sslvpn.ripe.net ([193.0.20.230] helo=vpn-50.ripe.net) by nene.ripe.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <tim@ripe.net>) id 1bzQC1-0007hh-Pu; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:32:41 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <DM2PR09MB0446D5E5310327B1766D6D4384AB0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:32:39 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8E2E93F5-6184-4E58-8EF8-65C5D43E54A2@ripe.net>
References: <yj9otwcjnfkl.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <DM2PR09MB0446D5E5310327B1766D6D4384AB0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-ACL-Warn: Delaying message
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: ----------
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -10.7 points pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------ -7.5 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 784d7acfe6559f2a0b602ec6519a071949d8140066c7bdc73f1bd743f0f6d11c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/IWSH0gE19TFMH1kgzh-I2zX5ApA>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-ads@ietf.org" <sidr-ads@ietf.org>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:32:53 -0000

Hi Sean, Tom, Russ, and all,

Sorry for bringing this up late. Technically past 25 October, and yes I would like to see this go through as you might expect from an author...

That said, can someone with good ASN.1-fu please have look at the changes w.r.t. ASN.1 structure and OIDs? I tried to include all your comments properly - but I would feel safer if one of you could confirm.

Thanks
Tim


> On 26 Oct 2016, at 05:13, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> wrote:
> 
> I read the draft once again. I support publication.
> 
> Found a minor typo in the last paragraph on p.15 (can be dealt with during RFC editor review process):
> s/the loss of on IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/the loss of one IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/
> 
> Sriram
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: sidr <sidr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:08 AM
> To: sidr@ietf.org; sidr-chairs@ietf.org; sidr-ads@ietf.org
> Subject: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends      10/25/2016
> 
> Howdy WG folks!
> The authors of:
>  draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered
> 
> believe they have addressed all inflight concerns/comments, the
> request is to WGLC this, consider it's place in the world and if
> appropriate pass this document along to the IESG for publication.
> 
> The abstract for this draft is:
>  "This document proposes an update to the certificate validation
>   procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational
>   fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while
>   retaining essential security features."
> 
> Let's have a read through, consider and reply with your thoughts please,
> this WGLC is set to expire: 10/25/2016 - October 25, 2016.
> 
> thanks for reading/replying/thinking!
> -chris
> co-chair-persona
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email