Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016

Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> Wed, 26 October 2016 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A6D129669; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c9E8aEGPj11A; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9C3F1279EB; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id n189so9082206qke.0; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=q9YMFugLR5Vay4lUU9b25c4M1A9RS1/Oj8YpFaRlySE=; b=KEiG62kNP3ii9wP2iJny3QKQ/8vEMJmo3pBoWko/AGr+xaZ8nnIq9rXoPG9cqJHwU0 SwjqP4NFLCeJdtiY4e0XCYF8nIGCS8kJ8ft5/+m6Uu7x7paJOcjinQAsC6Mj9h3cbeTb Onhk3Uj/Eocvqv+sblXeoH3WEn460T6NrMJIJ3ffyK1UmQ+3no+CM5P5epPtpz0zZggV h2YB5zF//bicNxOClX1+vgUaZxXijOqDt8ReGu5lNmYm3o6vbUMGW8ymEPa0vRwJAfZO LQKabGiBK/W5XAkNuxuM8tmdIu/ExP2g7V+iufDEkAvZjs+/esWupwv292gbJuZNTGuu iq3A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=q9YMFugLR5Vay4lUU9b25c4M1A9RS1/Oj8YpFaRlySE=; b=bwevhrfHTxfEHtMNgIQboJTySBmadRHTCoec2byS6oYfByQgp9p9al38BXHXlXVY3i 12iVeNgL1sd9hzAWjUL99FkGTenN8aiFGiGkt/NH/qygVRS8nR8xyzuXk/ybghAT4XPm /z2BvZDPDuipVfcVWqnrRASrPMdDL3IpuJMHMPC5DRzEFByvFVutkKJeJKHPYa4/b7Zp gdZyLEJIA22M2rU+hA6GBd+KbP31rtYGWYfh3xJOMNyEKXpi3cljsicNI1XZuQ5y3sBb M9D6iXQKn/xavPOQCoKhcKjl6E1MaLMHHAhcG8hKB/xnZ16fJ+6CIUZqLeYvTnmO+kzs z0jA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvfG1uEOoJq3Qc8tLyXXGhkOB8rHfWvv5wAua2y1IRJnp6W++zu/YAT9S63iPU0vDoFbKkKg/HWLuyK1Nw==
X-Received: by 10.233.223.132 with SMTP id t126mr2504098qkf.107.1477496039998; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: christopher.morrow@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.105.244 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8E2E93F5-6184-4E58-8EF8-65C5D43E54A2@ripe.net>
References: <yj9otwcjnfkl.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <DM2PR09MB0446D5E5310327B1766D6D4384AB0@DM2PR09MB0446.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <8E2E93F5-6184-4E58-8EF8-65C5D43E54A2@ripe.net>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:33:59 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: AVTYbC4Ao-3gnC00yM-K9zpQhZo
Message-ID: <CAL9jLab-0=mfnKzRobcXSrqt8PMC7NpBcnDbE6AXsH73bgPCHg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c043d289f0f11053fc65ac0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/5OogZJII4BEUTOehzTMhCP3_pqU>
Cc: "sidr-ads@ietf.org" <sidr-ads@ietf.org>, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, "sidr-chairs@ietf.org" <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidr@ietf.org" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends 10/25/2016
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 15:34:05 -0000

I'll prepare the shepherd doc and await an ack/nack to this mail before
pushing forward to IESG.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@ripe.net> wrote:

> Hi Sean, Tom, Russ, and all,
>
> Sorry for bringing this up late. Technically past 25 October, and yes I
> would like to see this go through as you might expect from an author...
>
> That said, can someone with good ASN.1-fu please have look at the changes
> w.r.t. ASN.1 structure and OIDs? I tried to include all your comments
> properly - but I would feel safer if one of you could confirm.
>
> Thanks
> Tim
>
>
> > On 26 Oct 2016, at 05:13, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) <
> kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> wrote:
> >
> > I read the draft once again. I support publication.
> >
> > Found a minor typo in the last paragraph on p.15 (can be dealt with
> during RFC editor review process):
> > s/the loss of on IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/the loss of one IP
> address prefix from the VRS-IP/
> >
> > Sriram
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: sidr <sidr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Chris Morrow <
> morrowc@ops-netman.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:08 AM
> > To: sidr@ietf.org; sidr-chairs@ietf.org; sidr-ads@ietf.org
> > Subject: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered -
> ends      10/25/2016
> >
> > Howdy WG folks!
> > The authors of:
> >  draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered
> >
> > believe they have addressed all inflight concerns/comments, the
> > request is to WGLC this, consider it's place in the world and if
> > appropriate pass this document along to the IESG for publication.
> >
> > The abstract for this draft is:
> >  "This document proposes an update to the certificate validation
> >   procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational
> >   fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while
> >   retaining essential security features."
> >
> > Let's have a read through, consider and reply with your thoughts please,
> > this WGLC is set to expire: 10/25/2016 - October 25, 2016.
> >
> > thanks for reading/replying/thinking!
> > -chris
> > co-chair-persona
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > sidr mailing list
> > sidr@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>