Re: [sidr] adverse actions -01 posted

Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de> Wed, 27 July 2016 19:05 UTC

Return-Path: <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AF112D836 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:05:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.488
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.488 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.287, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O32QzXT1o135 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6109612D522 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:05:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1bSU8l-003AFk-Bf>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:05:11 +0200
Received: from x5ce7e24d.dyn.telefonica.de ([92.231.226.77] helo=mw-PC.fritz.box) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1bSU8k-001vkQ-VT>; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:05:11 +0200
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 21:02:57 +0200
From: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
In-Reply-To: <afb4f8dc-3e29-c8fe-f8fe-2d7b2fcd7a1f@bbn.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1607272054380.15548@mw-PC>
References: <76dad5c8-114a-19fe-6fc2-cf3c45e0f666@bbn.com> <227BF007-90BD-4301-A349-FC01A1A5969A@ripe.net> <c9243c24-e976-c234-01c7-110c768ba0b6@bbn.com> <m2zip43s0q.wl%randy@psg.com> <afb4f8dc-3e29-c8fe-f8fe-2d7b2fcd7a1f@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23)
X-X-Sender: waehl@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Originating-IP: 92.231.226.77
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/C9jX_AYdPa02_cfxxrspH9-cOik>
Cc: sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] adverse actions -01 posted
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 19:05:17 -0000

Hi Steve,

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Stephen Kent wrote:

> Tim offered no suggestion for a different term, which is not helpful. 
>
  the suggestion was "unwanted".

  I just had a brief look into "Internet Security Glossary, Version 2" 
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4949), "corrupted" could be an 
alternative but I suppose it's still not light version.



Cheers
  matthias