Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Thu, 18 May 2023 05:01 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2D8C15108D; Wed, 17 May 2023 22:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oyJX_fxEHAyB; Wed, 17 May 2023 22:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6BECC14CE51; Wed, 17 May 2023 22:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1pzVlf-0001JQ-7Y; Thu, 18 May 2023 05:01:35 +0000
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 22:01:34 -0700
Message-ID: <m28rdms05t.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert=40nist.gov@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
In-Reply-To: <BLAPR09MB632225B977B3138A7E05793E98789@BLAPR09MB6322.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BLAPR09MB632225B977B3138A7E05793E98789@BLAPR09MB6322.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/H24l2uYTJZ-T1h_JyMxllrrsHAw>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 05:01:44 -0000

> When processing the ASPA PDU of
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis-10,
> the profile draft
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-profile-13.txt
> and in particular Appendix A mentions that: “Note that two PDUs are
> always generated per Customer ASID: one with AFI Flags = IPv4 and one
> with AFI Flags = IPv6.”. This requires when using 8210bis to propagate
> the data to the router (client) that 2 separate PDU’s need to be
> generated because a single ASPA PDU only contains provider information
> for a single AFI.
> 
> Question:
> =========
> What error code should I use when the router only receives in total
> one of them?

42 - bad internet-draft