Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 02 June 2023 13:11 UTC

Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 15:10:59 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Hollyman, Michael" <mhollyman=40verisign.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
cc: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidrops-aspa-verification@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <F338C878-E41A-4DB7-A4C6-1CEE0A6F6502@verisign.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2306021505270.20454@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <F338C878-E41A-4DB7-A4C6-1CEE0A6F6502@verisign.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/LHPr4RuvRrZHTwEe77br4EIOw8M>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
Precedence: list

On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, Hollyman, Michael wrote:

> It appears to me that the spirit of ASPA is to simply list the provider 
> ASes for a CAS. Keeping that simple and by AS, not by AFI, seems to be a 
> logical choice.

We have successfully deployed Peer Locking 
(https://archive.nanog.org/sites/default/files/Snijders_Everyday_Practical_Bgp.pdf) 
for several years and have chosen to do this in an AFI independent fashion 
with same AS-path regexp used for both IPv4 and IPv6.

I agree that it's a logical choice to not have AFI specifics here since 
most will have same information for both AFIs which will cause 
duplication of information if required to be AFI specific.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

[Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be use… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
[Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-ietf… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Job Snijders
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Hollyman, Michael
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tony Tauber
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Yangyang Wang
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… gengnan
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)