Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> Wed, 24 May 2023 13:26 UTC

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20230524152102.5fdfd8f0@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 15:25:43 +0200
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A40A6EDF-7DF6-4085-9274-CB76122DB1D9@nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <SA1PR09MB8142523FA03AC4EA6E0E014E847C9@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <SA1PR09MB814235BE0566A5C6935CF5B184439@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <SA1PR09MB814231707524646D651B69B884439@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <ZGs5bFRjPLnyL2Jd@diehard.n-r-g.com> <25708.55138.924074.242182@hrabosky.cbbtier3.att.net> <ZG2Vobyxl/gPEfCU@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20230524100558.452d4caf@smaug.local.partim.org> <ZG3bN1p4EzSn4XIS@diehard.n-r-g.com> <CAMFGGcDCpQDYNbYKLEp+iT4rx_FNLoWkdNmET8tH1JdQpgi5XQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2v8ghzypr.wl-randy@psg.com> <20230524152102.5fdfd8f0@glaurung.nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Martin Hoffmann <martin@nlnetlabs.nl>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/QGBfcshcJ789wXZhmeLOTPXBlkk>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
Precedence: list

Hi (again)

Sorry, I tripped over the send button ;)

> On 24 May 2023, at 15:21, Martin Hoffmann <martin@nlnetlabs.nl> wrote:
> 
> Randy Bush wrote:
>> perhaps we are responsible for taking a slightly longer term view.
>> 
>> today, ipv6 routing is simply not congruent with ipv4.  we might wish
>> it, but reality bites.
> 
> The question is whether the benefit of allowing to express the
> difference outweighs its cost, i.e., whether there is an realistic risk
> that someone accidentally announces a prefix along a path that wasn’t
> meant for this prefix’ address family and, if so, whether that is
> worthwhile catching. (I’m assuming hijacking isn’t possible here, which
> may be wrong.)

This is pretty much what I was going to write.

I understand that there are differences. But, is it a big enough problem if a provider that is only used for one AFI, is also authorised for the other? Enough so to warrant the complexity in the profile and validation?

I do not have a huge stake in this. I am happy enough to keep the limit if that's the consensus. I am also happy enough to remove the limit from my CA implementation if that is the outcome.

Tim

> 
>  -- Martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops

[Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be use… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
[Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-ietf… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Job Snijders
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Hollyman, Michael
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Mikael Abrahamsson
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tony Tauber
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Yangyang Wang
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… gengnan
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)