IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?

Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl> Wed, 24 May 2023 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C883C15270B for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 06:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i3O6bNGqbU6t for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 06:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dane.soverin.net (dane.soverin.net [185.233.34.24]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 259FDC14CE3B for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2023 06:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by dane.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QRBg90Mldz10P4; Wed, 24 May 2023 13:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4QRBg82DcWzHw; Wed, 24 May 2023 13:22:12 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1684934532; bh=vKjb12w5D2+xpCLp1nplI/RQH2rlH7xqFS+NKisE5NQ=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=R7TGT1eSqGaNmE+m+tGOce8Bgk1j+HFypuMDJXwGITVfB6v3IceJIx4+2kxghpzXu fYaBoUQg+PReK2aAEuYnrlM2iyqy9uIHoONjfceAs+04mELXZkckwRzHHD0TSVyr7s eUMQSidAGj5sDeLIdOnoE2oC1pMx9zQtsrL5GpFRulKxMbiylBzeFvvR9g79HXf1J6 64q+/unJZWxq/umAcAtPcbGpGwVSQUcf+WB4Ku7zc9IfkAL/mdI3krbP0SJiBTYdxK MhmXkvN5aDwLqAN+tBzP8xQT6qnrqthQ3hfmqOj0gROjywG/RCMlBoRdJKGTEOPLSz tC+odI+tYgJ4w==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.400.51.1.1\))
X-Soverin-Authenticated: true
From: Tim Bruijnzeels <tim@nlnetlabs.nl>
In-Reply-To: <m2v8ghzypr.wl-randy@psg.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 15:21:59 +0200
Cc: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <C8845992-6CA9-4DC8-A566-0ADC905B233C@nlnetlabs.nl>
References: <SA1PR09MB8142523FA03AC4EA6E0E014E847C9@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <SA1PR09MB814235BE0566A5C6935CF5B184439@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <SA1PR09MB814231707524646D651B69B884439@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <ZGs5bFRjPLnyL2Jd@diehard.n-r-g.com> <25708.55138.924074.242182@hrabosky.cbbtier3.att.net> <ZG2Vobyxl/gPEfCU@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20230524100558.452d4caf@smaug.local.partim.org> <ZG3bN1p4EzSn4XIS@diehard.n-r-g.com> <CAMFGGcDCpQDYNbYKLEp+iT4rx_FNLoWkdNmET8tH1JdQpgi5XQ@mail.gmail.com> <m2v8ghzypr.wl-randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/wcqZtNQhWPy2MUAvpzDKsi1dZzQ>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 13:22:20 -0000

Hi,

> On 24 May 2023, at 14:43, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> 
> perhaps we are responsible for taking a slightly longer term view.
> 
> today, ipv6 routing is simply not congruent with ipv4.  we might wish
> it, but reality bites.
> 
> we may in the period of the most congruence.  it slowly increased over
> the decades when ipv6 started ramping up.  but dual stack does not
> really work as it needs as much ipv4 as before and increasing.  in some
> years, congruence will start to ramp back down as ipv4 is less and less
> a must have as we are really running out of it.
> 
> randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email