Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 24 May 2023 12:43 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55316C1516F3 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 05:43:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vcdXrCcK_1Vv for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 May 2023 05:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2575C1516F2 for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 May 2023 05:43:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.rg.net) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1q1nqD-000VPe-V4; Wed, 24 May 2023 12:43:46 +0000
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 05:43:44 -0700
Message-ID: <m2v8ghzypr.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@fastly.com>
Cc: SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAMFGGcDCpQDYNbYKLEp+iT4rx_FNLoWkdNmET8tH1JdQpgi5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <SA1PR09MB8142523FA03AC4EA6E0E014E847C9@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <SA1PR09MB814235BE0566A5C6935CF5B184439@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <SA1PR09MB814231707524646D651B69B884439@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <ZGs5bFRjPLnyL2Jd@diehard.n-r-g.com> <25708.55138.924074.242182@hrabosky.cbbtier3.att.net> <ZG2Vobyxl/gPEfCU@diehard.n-r-g.com> <20230524100558.452d4caf@smaug.local.partim.org> <ZG3bN1p4EzSn4XIS@diehard.n-r-g.com> <CAMFGGcDCpQDYNbYKLEp+iT4rx_FNLoWkdNmET8tH1JdQpgi5XQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/cWh0fWnJ-GwfFLcqBBBpjTTupLo>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 12:43:51 -0000
perhaps we are responsible for taking a slightly longer term view. today, ipv6 routing is simply not congruent with ipv4. we might wish it, but reality bites. we may in the period of the most congruence. it slowly increased over the decades when ipv6 started ramping up. but dual stack does not really work as it needs as much ipv4 as before and increasing. in some years, congruence will start to ramp back down as ipv4 is less and less a must have as we are really running out of it. randy
- [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be use… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- [Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-ietf… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Hollyman, Michael
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tony Tauber
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Yangyang Wang
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… gengnan
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)