Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
"Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov> Fri, 19 May 2023 14:26 UTC
Return-Path: <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFF6C15198F; Fri, 19 May 2023 07:26:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FROM_GOV_DKIM_AU=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nist.gov
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G2WXqRREHFf3; Fri, 19 May 2023 07:26:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GCC02-BL0-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl0gcc02on20706.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:7d05::706]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E461DC151532; Fri, 19 May 2023 07:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=ahoTzTTX8f9yBVXchjzEapNDlkEJp141qJzPxjYmkh3JVr8NiXb6szOQi7oWPO1rd0ybMgzDVR0eLfS3HbGyMmussB/9w9DWnFlZzD/1Hn0hbhWfARnCnmBQdoBBEOA/UJa8H06zfp4KCk3IUJ+Wv6Q5UrVFC6YW1EBJgs4ljLEmhDHW9T50HcUohvYRFNmr1k8trkQ505C7c2JTn4Ke2bKNuibqLsVtvvpH0/9jGLgbetgYUIlkCgxOHed7BAf/6cG+0P0sn7GB6cwj6Bo5ISaXPvkSbB+xCMvJSwHMa2JZh5ymdcb2uzSFeeoFGZuA6YO/xp1cY7r63Eu/H0XyJQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=HIltCmgwQYRVbR6eA5HlmGVN/M2/nEumipKYuNgNqwk=; b=cfipRiiMbBJu9CdgQl2BS3l0YhnVyeRZy3EOVWmXC8N9/AnyhP8ILx0nak2oVNTFxSqrIvmCPKP6045SHmDiiCnz86LDG27YUIaq7WsBVHhH+MpzXNzpy472U/e3zm9icyfLSiGdjtkI+LuImUHdzPScnGJU6dlblpddFiTS35kywcwQ3Ed9rcnifzsDWbZrlR7f692zBQmG0aLJVBkJgPeAKUjXN3vjd8utqjEKg9HAsqvVLMJQF/wuDRW9FzbFmdn/kE9Pgs1fPBTAh9AThXbXIlBwnf3pJVMYMTgoAXO9chxq4o/YlBu+uUv6lrjnlu84ZRFOI6a4Cl0Y5zEu6g==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=nist.gov; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=nist.gov; dkim=pass header.d=nist.gov; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nist.gov; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=HIltCmgwQYRVbR6eA5HlmGVN/M2/nEumipKYuNgNqwk=; b=MxaOEbpgyGaJHJsneDcR79Bm2fsN8SZMursr0GYM2G7qEQH062kOj3fHKRwKw0+TFFYFaFRn4+p/yARXZM3A3H7JWIsKBRXpHjYWYZBm2lDSgOdSNBWmx0znZojNGNtYDbOdXj4+gM0g97HbU9MEJ6+FMVa3NT+4+XFDZo7oBe1Zca84e7+xO0Fff61l4GzMYbA+3A+py9ZL30fLSnKOwpAeKRaalD8oQ4A5+NIBghuWhfoXx7Nm8CtortVeSLCr8Jaw1uJg0loNheteULsgIgYvjS0K15wwF7Eo7JH0Lw7KioOgnoYaqv55+lxTdDm4ihU/xLe5ZXGMEX5Y5pA6Pg==
Received: from SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:806:171::8) by PH0PR09MB10576.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:2c9::13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6387.30; Fri, 19 May 2023 14:26:10 +0000
Received: from SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::226a:790b:a85c:d03e]) by SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::226a:790b:a85c:d03e%6]) with mapi id 15.20.6411.021; Fri, 19 May 2023 14:26:09 +0000
From: "Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
To: Claudio Jeker <cjeker@diehard.n-r-g.com>, "Borchert, Oliver (Fed)" <oliver.borchert@nist.gov>
CC: "sidrops@ietf.org" <sidrops@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-sidrops-8210bis@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
Thread-Index: AdmKAKBhW6fOSNqTTbW/q5IBmucBQA==
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 14:26:09 +0000
Message-ID: <SA1PR09MB8142523FA03AC4EA6E0E014E847C9@SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=nist.gov;
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SA1PR09MB8142:EE_|PH0PR09MB10576:EE_
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 74b10757-2fa5-4c83-d249-08db5874fd8e
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230028)(4636009)(366004)(451199021)(83380400001)(6636002)(4326008)(38070700005)(66476007)(54906003)(38100700002)(82960400001)(9686003)(498600001)(55016003)(76116006)(7696005)(66946007)(5660300002)(110136005)(66446008)(66556008)(8676002)(71200400001)(52536014)(6506007)(26005)(8936002)(86362001)(2906002)(64756008)(33656002)(186003)(122000001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_SA1PR09MB8142523FA03AC4EA6E0E014E847C9SA1PR09MB8142namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nist.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: SA1PR09MB8142.namprd09.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 74b10757-2fa5-4c83-d249-08db5874fd8e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 19 May 2023 14:26:09.6394 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 2ab5d82f-d8fa-4797-a93e-054655c61dec
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR09MB10576
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/C5newCanz60yBNc6myoEZfQnMoc>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be used?
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 14:26:20 -0000
Claudio, Oliver, and all: How does this change in the verification draft (Section 4) sound to you? This is the change you seem to be saying will fix the issue (eliminate the possibility of implementation error). We'll also reference this (or state it) in the main body (not appendix) of the profile draft. OLD text: If, despite the above recommendations, the ASPA(s) of a CAS includes SPAS for one AFI but not for the other AFI (not even an AS 0), the ASPA SHALL NOT be rejected just for that reason. However, such an ASPA(s) will be presumed to imply that the CAS has no providers (equivalent to AS 0 SPAS) for the AFI that they neglected to include. NEW text: If, despite the above recommendations, the ASPA(s) of a CAS includes SPAS for one AFI but not for the other AFI (not even an AS 0), a SPAS containing only AS 0 MUST be included in the VAP-SPAS for the neglected AFI for the CAS. In this case, later if the ASPA(s) in consideration is withdrawn and given no other ASPA changes for the CAS, said SPAS containing only AS 0 MUST be removed from the VAP-SPAS list, resulting in no entry in the list for the CAS (for both AFIs). -------- Claudio: You were suggesting the following in your reply to Oliver: >So you should not error out if an AFI object is missing instead an implicit >AS 0 entry for the missing AFI should be inserted. How this is done is up >to the implementation. Would you say the need for new error code is obviated with the above change in text? Do you see a need for any other changes in the profile or verification drafts on this issue? Thank you. Sriram
- [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be use… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- [Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-ietf… Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] some wording improvements in draft-… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Job Snijders
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Randy Bush
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Martin Hoffmann
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Jay Borkenhagen
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Hollyman, Michael
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tony Tauber
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Yangyang Wang
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Tim Bruijnzeels
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… gengnan
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Claudio Jeker
- Re: [Sidrops] Which 8210-bis error code should be… Borchert, Oliver (Fed)