Re: [sip-clf] WGLC: SIPCLF Problem Statement (draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01)

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <> Fri, 05 February 2010 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABBB28C0E3 for <>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:06:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.489
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.489 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.110, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mEK3lhDTtcAs for <>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:06:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346D53A69F9 for <>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 11:06:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id o15J7HIZ016612 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:07:17 -0600 (CST)
Received: from [] ( []) by (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id o15J7GlA007818; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 13:07:16 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 13:07:16 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <>
Organization: Bell Labs Security Technology Research Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Cullen Jennings <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on
Cc: SIP-CLF Mailing List <>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] WGLC: SIPCLF Problem Statement (draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01)
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:06:30 -0000

Cullen Jennings wrote:
> Some random comments - all sent in my individual contributor role.
> I like this draft, think it is fine work, but it needs a few more
> things before it is done. These are all things that I think can help
> us speed up the actual clf work if we can agree on them.
> Section 8 should be renamed to "Information Model"

Cullen: Thanks for your comments.

The need for an "Information Model" seems to fairly high
right now --  Rainer refers to it as well in one of his emails
as being the part that we need to get right.  Others have
as well in the past, so I suspect doing this right is worth
the time.

So, this is what I will do:  I will go ahead and respin
draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement as
draft-ietf-sipclf-problem-statement (i.e., no changes except
file name).  Then I will work on updating the draft with
the information model, which we can discuss in Anaheim.

Specific comments you had on what fields should be in the
information model and what should be out of it can be
discussed in more detail once we have a section that lays
out this model.


- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{,,}