Re: [sip-clf] WGLC: SIPCLF ProblemStatement(draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01)

["Spencer Dawkins" <[e-mail]>]

Speaking as co-chair, this time...

>> Everything is just munged together into one problem statement, as if 
>> everybody was in agreement about a single problem to be solved, and the 
>> single solution that should solve all those problems.
>
> My attempt at a problem statement is given in Section 3 of
> the sipclf draft 
> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gurbani-sipclf-problem-statement-01)
> If this gives you the feeling that everything is munged together,
> I will be happy to work with you on any text you can contribute
> that makes this more transparent.

Where Spencer and Theo think we are, is that we're adopting the next version 
of this draft as a working group draft. We haven't seen anyone disagreeing 
with that.

At that point - which we might as well declare to be "now", because Vijay 
can send in "the next version" as draft-ietf-sipclf at any time, and Theo 
and I will approve it - the working group becomes responsible for the text 
in the working group draft.

That means that it's not up to Vijay and Dave to work this out, with 
everyone else cheering them on from the sidelines - please feel free to send 
text that the editor can incorporate, as we identify that we have consensus 
on it!

Thanks,

Spencer