Re: [sipcore] About SUBSCRIBE method's performance and Out-of-Dialog notification suggestion:

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Tue, 04 January 2011 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F383A69A9 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:52:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.428
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.428 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.171, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aMPO44+5qC8S for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:52:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3463A6A17 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:52:49 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7b89ae0000036a3-a3-4d23891f4151
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.124]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E6.FB.13987.F19832D4; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:54:55 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.237]) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.84]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:54:54 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>, "sipcore@ietf.org" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 21:54:18 +0100
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] About SUBSCRIBE method's performance and Out-of-Dialog notification suggestion:
Thread-Index: AcusT3E3slCnSDBMQ62TnMLGjM8sXAAAhzTS
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05850482F0DB@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <OFFE9A94AD.A56650E3-ON4825780E.0019F49D-4825780E.001DA589@zte.com.cn> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B40@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>, <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E5898DE@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B2202288B42@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>, <4D238569.8010902@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D238569.8010902@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Subject: Re: [sipcore] About SUBSCRIBE method's performance and Out-of-Dialog notification suggestion:
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:52:52 -0000

Hi,

Stateful proxies also maintain state.

Regards,

Christer

________________________________________
From: sipcore-bounces@ietf.org [sipcore-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Kyzivat [pkyzivat@cisco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 10:39 PM
To: sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sipcore] About SUBSCRIBE method's performance and Out-of-Dialog notification suggestion:

On 1/4/2011 12:13 PM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:
> ________________________________________
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) [keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com]
>
> The key here is to understanding what dialog state needs to be maintained, and the proposal as currently described does not seem to change that.
> ________________________________________
>
> I suspect that the question is dialog state maintained in intermediate elements, as many SIP systems coming from traditional telco companies implement intermediate elements as B2BUAs, and often have up to a dozen B2BUAs in what would be expected in SIP to be a single dialog.  I expect Gao will clarify the question when his day arrives.

If this is the issue, then it just points out the obvious - that there
are consequences to using B2BUAs rather than proxies. If it hurts, don't
do it.

        Thanks,
        Paul
_______________________________________________
sipcore mailing list
sipcore@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore