IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] About SUBSCRIBE method's performance and Out-of-Dialog notification suggestion:

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com> Wed, 12 January 2011 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637B628C129 for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:21:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.080, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NL+gtmlrGTJQ for <sipcore@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:21:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A81428C128 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 06:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoAGABRILU1AZnwN/2dsb2JhbACECJIljhFzo1WKTwiNe4Edgzd4BIRMHIYogyA
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2011 14:23:59 +0000
Received: from [10.86.254.119] ([10.86.254.119]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0CENw1A003402; Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:23:59 GMT
Message-ID: <4D2DB97E.8080800@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:23:58 -0500
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gao.yang2@zte.com.cn
References: <OF17380627.573A6541-ON48257816.0030DFC0-48257816.003277EB@zte.com.cn>
In-Reply-To: <OF17380627.573A6541-ON48257816.0030DFC0-48257816.003277EB@zte.com.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>, sipcore@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sipcore] About SUBSCRIBE method's performance and Out-of-Dialog notification suggestion:
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:21:43 -0000

On 1/12/2011 4:08 AM, gao.yang2@zte.com.cn wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It seems that we haven't reached an agreement for this topic. I'd like 
> to put together a discussion text for this issue, including:
> 
> 1. Typical traffic model for SUBSCRIBE and Notification and Performance 
> analysis;
> 2. Out-of-Dialog Notifaction optional solutions;
> 3. Interworking and compatibility.
> 
> Would this topic welcome in the coming IETF meeting in Czech?

IMO that is premature. I'd like to see more interest on the list.
You might find it useful to write up your thoughts as a draft, which
might provide the basis for more to comment on.

	Thanks,
	Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email