Re: AW: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00
Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@cisco.com> Tue, 07 November 2006 02:46 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhGyS-0002bP-Q4; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:46:04 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhGyR-0002bA-2m for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:46:03 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GhGyP-0003ME-OJ for sipping@ietf.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:46:03 -0500
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2006 18:46:01 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,393,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="86441071:sNHT48679326"
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com (sj-core-1.cisco.com [171.71.177.237]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kA72k122020055; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:46:01 -0800
Received: from xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-211.cisco.com [171.70.151.144]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kA72j6B0016837; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:46:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.187]) by xbh-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:45:29 -0800
Received: from [130.129.71.49] ([10.21.82.238]) by xfe-sjc-212.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:45:29 -0800
Message-ID: <454FB9C8.8000800@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 17:40:08 -0500
From: Jonathan Rosenberg <jdrosen@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Huelsemann, Martin" <Martin.Huelsemann@t-com.net>
Subject: Re: AW: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00
References: <CCA850DCD3FBE2479D5076C5C18732220168A6DA@S4DE9JSAAHW.ost.t-com.de>
In-Reply-To: <CCA850DCD3FBE2479D5076C5C18732220168A6DA@S4DE9JSAAHW.ost.t-com.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Nov 2006 02:45:29.0285 (UTC) FILETIME=[C9486750:01C70216]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=1466; t=1162867561; x=1163731561; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jdrosen@cisco.com; z=From:Jonathan=20Rosenberg=20<jdrosen@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20AW=3A=20[Sipping]=20comments=20on=20draft-roach-sipping-callcomp -bfcp-00; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DM3ODl/OfYagA97HxHhrOOkPCtGQ=3D; b=udJgLKrSt3kwV778YG05Pj12qamINN5eaWt7CJ1GySzpo/QumUPa/DbMrUT1INDG2+mF1RoH g01tmr9MN/3KPh4mdeqY6i+GANIbvrNIJ8skvS1HcNVqS1QuORa24MS4;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4.cisco.com; header.From=jdrosen@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 97adf591118a232206bdb5a27b217034
Cc: sipping@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org
Huelsemann, Martin wrote: > Hi Jonathan, all, > > I don't think that there really is a relationship between presence > and call completion. Presence is about the general availibility of a > certain user, call completion provides the possibility to complete a > call to a certain destination you've got a busy error response from. I completely disagree. When you invoke the CCBS service, the ringback you get when they are "available" is exactly presence. However, in the PSTN, it is limited to the only concept of presence they have - whether you are on a call or not. In an IP world, I can be unavailable for voice service even though I'm not in a call strictly speaking. For example, if I've got five parallel IM sessions, and as a consequence, I set my voice service to "closed" through presence, what is the desired behavior of the SIP-based CCBS system? I would assert that I *dont* want the callback to come now. If it does, I won't answer it anyway since I'm busy with other things. So, the call goes to voicemail or goes unanswered. That does not seem like the desired behavior. -Jonathan R. -- Jonathan D. Rosenberg, Ph.D. 600 Lanidex Plaza Cisco Fellow Parsippany, NJ 07054-2711 Cisco Systems jdrosen@cisco.com FAX: (973) 952-5050 http://www.jdrosen.net PHONE: (973) 952-5000 http://www.cisco.com _______________________________________________ Sipping mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
- [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcom… Jonathan Rosenberg
- AW: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Huelsemann, Martin
- Re: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Adam Roach
- AW: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Huelsemann, Martin
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Elwell, John
- AW: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Huelsemann, Martin
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… GARCIN Sebastien RD-CORE-ISS
- Re: AW: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping… Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: AW: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping… Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Michael Hammer (mhammer)
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… GARCIN Sebastien RD-CORE-ISS
- Re: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Jeroen van Bemmel
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… GARCIN Sebastien RD-CORE-ISS
- Re: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Thomas.Froment
- Re: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Jeroen van Bemmel
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Michael Hammer (mhammer)
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Elwell, John
- RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-cal… Francois Audet