RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00

"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens.com> Wed, 08 November 2006 21:39 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ghv8x-0001nd-5t; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:39:35 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ghv8w-0001nV-1G for sipping@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:39:34 -0500
Received: from mailgate.siemenscomms.co.uk ([195.171.110.225] helo=bemg01.siemenscomms.co.uk) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ghv8q-0000j5-Mo for sipping@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 16:39:32 -0500
Received: from ntht207e.uksgcs.siemenscomms.co.uk ([137.223.247.82]) by siemenscomms.co.uk (PMDF V6.0-24 #40642) with ESMTP id <0J8F00B7NLHKP3@siemenscomms.co.uk> for sipping@ietf.org; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:39:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by ntht207e.uksgcs.siemenscomms.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <49LG0G8Q>; Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:39:09 +0000
Content-return: allowed
Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2006 21:39:07 +0000
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens.com>
Subject: RE: [Sipping] comments on draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00
To: Thomas.Froment@alcatel.fr, Jeroen van Bemmel <jbemmel@zonnet.nl>
Message-id: <50B1CBA96870A34799A506B2313F26670A5023AE@ntht201e.siemenscomms.co.uk>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-type: text/plain
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, IETF Sipping List <sipping@ietf.org>, "Michael Hammer (mhammer)" <mhammer@cisco.com>
X-BeenThere: sipping@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "SIPPING Working Group \(applications of SIP\)" <sipping.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:sipping@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping>, <mailto:sipping-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: sipping-bounces@ietf.org

As I stated at the mic yesterday and also in an earlier email, I do not
think the BFCP approach is a sensible way of solving the call completion
problem.

Setting aside alternative solutions that might be more appropriate in a pure
SIP environment, if the main driver is to provide a solution that can
interwork with PSTN CCBS/CCNR, we should try to satisfy this requirement in
the simplest way possible. IMO, BFCP is not the simplest approach and
introduces unwanted complexity, particularly at a gateway. I think the
Poetzle draft is a far better starting point, especially if we could try to
align it better with the principles of RFC 3265, for example following some
of the suggestions of Jeroen.

John   

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas.Froment@alcatel.fr [mailto:Thomas.Froment@alcatel.fr] 
> Sent: 08 November 2006 13:49
> To: Jeroen van Bemmel
> Cc: IETF Sipping List; Adam Roach; Michael Hammer (mhammer)
> Subject: Re: [Sipping] comments on 
> draft-roach-sipping-callcomp-bfcp-00
> 
> About the usage of BFCP, chairs started a poll yesterday during the 
> meeting, but decided to stop it after 5/10 people raised 
> their hand to 
> vote for "this is a good approach"...
> Then, Rohan(I think) asked "who understand  / is interested by the 
> problem"?, and since few people were responding, nobody got 
> the chance 
> to vote for "this is NOT a good approach"...
> 
> So, maybe we can start a new poll on mailing list with 
> *interested* people?
> 
> Jeroen van Bemmel wrote:
> 
> > That being said, I believe what is triggering the 
> "academic" objections is the underlying model of 
> draft-poetzl-sipping-call-completion-01: multiple 
> subscriptions to a single resource (the CCBS/CCNR queue) but 
> a single notification to the "first, non-suspended 
> subscriber". That goes against
> > RFC3265 (in more than one ways)
> >   
> Can you clatify this statement? for me, this  is not 
> completely clear why...
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
> This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
> Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
> Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP
> 

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use sip-implementors@cs.columbia.edu for questions on current sip
Use sip@ietf.org for new developments of core SIP