IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-08.txt

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 13 August 2013 07:34 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: softwires@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3F621F99B8 for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MWokdn2wne8t for <softwires@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from banjo.employees.org (banjo.employees.org [IPv6:2001:1868:205::19]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D30821F8904 for <softwires@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:34:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-lys01-vla250-10-147-112-207.cisco.com (173-38-208-169.cisco.com [173.38.208.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by banjo.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC48C5E85; Tue, 13 Aug 2013 00:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEC7E980D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:34:19 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <86841AD5-1864-4177-BEE1-4181DDE085EF@employees.org>
References: <20130812121654.30206.92319.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36EEC7E980D@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: "softwires@ietf.org" <softwires@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-08.txt
X-BeenThere: softwires@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: softwires wg discussion list <softwires.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/softwires>
List-Post: <mailto:softwires@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires>, <mailto:softwires-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 07:34:22 -0000

Med,

> I have two comments about the new version:
> 
> * The document does not cite the unified CPE I-D. I think Senthil already raised this point to the authors, but it seems this was not taken into account. I suggest adding that document as a normative reference.

the unified CPE document depends on MAP, not the other way around. 

> * I-D.ietf-softwire-map-dhcp is to be listed as an example to achieve provisioning (other means can be supported). This ref can be cited as informative and not normative one.

true, the reason it is listed as normative is because we have a SHOULD for DHCP:
   "A CE that allows IPv6 configuration by DHCP SHOULD implement this option."

cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email