Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-08.txt

[<[e-mail]>]

Re-,

Yes, there is a WGLC but this does not mean that the document as it is solves all raised issues. Senthil did already raised this point to the authors of MAP and MAP-T drafts in June 19, but unless I'm mistaken I didn't saw a follow up to his request. 

I hope we can close this point ASAP so that the MAP document can move forward.

Thanks.
Cheers,
Med


>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Ole Troan [mailto:[e-mail]]
>Envoyé : mardi 13 août 2013 13:16
>À : Qi Sun
>Cc : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/OLN; [e-mail]
>Objet : Re: [Softwires] I-D Action: draft-ietf-softwire-map-08.txt
>
>Qi,
>
>> IMHO, the Unified CPE defines some functionalities and behaviors of CE
>side, e.g. tunnel endpoint, NAT44, how to use these functions on CPE etc.,
>which MAP depends on.
>>
>> As for the provisioning method, map-dhcp is one of the methods could be
>used in MAP. The discussion is taking place in the Unified CPE for
>provisioning. So I think it should be an informative reference in MAP base
>draft.
>
>so you are saying that draft-ietf-softwire-map cannot stand on its own, but
>depend on text in unified CPE?
>if so, what is missing? which parts of the unified CPE draft should be
>referenced? please propose text changes to the document.
>
>I am open to the possibility that I'm wrong of course, but I can't know
>that for sure, before I see what text changes you propose.
>I'm not trying to be difficult (at least not more than usual), but the
>document has passed WGLC, and we're restrictive about accepting changes.
>
>cheers,
>Ole