IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter

Quynh Dang <quynh97@gmail.com> Tue, 06 November 2018 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <quynh97@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spasm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660A512D4EA for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:40:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JnCT82pdeJJd for <spasm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59972127333 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Nov 2018 19:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id k19-v6so10085620lji.11 for <spasm@ietf.org>; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 19:40:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0lpoD3C7fvCG7QdY6CBwU0fo0MjuKJom1TQEhyVcOWg=; b=IoTlm7hzZn7cxMEctolUDQgoM20UoJ5W4IoZT5Uswq9oQVOkYye60Huo5FTArt4kYm 3H9gpTf3twl7KKsuEGfvPdMSb3jilUR3I4M+TIPQLqFj3CAzashlM9+h7uR9CMPngg/7 KUi0qq9C2oxlEoILutwSqBxbCv3+9FDosB2siJPeTfQaD36/XhtpDYlNN6caBoVJ3W3f QxeZfPP78Gmt0mKEmX95pCyKuEVF7JPvrEpAZXbzySDYTzaNbUs3oVF3vi5OiqMMnK0G dQjGiUvXz5gRhE0svOT0bsk47OT4qvcMoxYJJ89yZ1hUUr1c3NG36dAJxQcTYp1j+TqD gd0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0lpoD3C7fvCG7QdY6CBwU0fo0MjuKJom1TQEhyVcOWg=; b=J/G2qWxsWHBZVF+uEQljPgR11MVd27+jpZS2NhgzRvqwOiupMI8n0TdUp8yT7Dle1M 6iDIVv813K/h4WSpLPBFcNdWi5jy2I2tMHjIUUf5/jvIJoC211kjKHvsumVQtjLP4j8z 5BpKlzNWKiFAbyJ+dn+3Q+qYUhvFYzXqfrxU4LWbcVqSLYQwysACrF5ZNzFHYq1gf6bT jMIlMdd/bE3+FtZkUmdktf1tonfBguX0ssHKUswij+EDMKIRRAwknCl0I6XQBh9az9No wuPJ+8fhLPZvpglk8xwYERKvhs3mvJhL2O1oXvtJ8ZjZGOQXSHyCoc4tsGn1owXwx/ej wJpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gItjbePPCPgY0ufcFIRLJfcsingrKYIWBGrh1Rvra3HH/65/ZIr AOZkmo3UAt0KcsOU/iU/qOcI2MUCIZnPUms99Ypizw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5chGBf04qmlPnaXVi0jwfHwhTET5jA8udh4w9vrnvKbivJ33zeXFNDjXNux8VuP7dEcVijszfYpSBrq+AUNki0=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:710a:: with SMTP id m10-v6mr12155153ljc.66.1541475623469; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 19:40:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DC188C55-6FDE-4E64-9151-54815E96B50B@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <DC188C55-6FDE-4E64-9151-54815E96B50B@vigilsec.com>
From: Quynh Dang <quynh97@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2018 22:40:11 -0500
Message-ID: <CAE3-qLSbZM1j=Y0tAyq63Teb88Xg=k6=ibCGTsXnrgikmbGrTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: spasm@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f786de0579f6c213"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spasm/CAC6b3Tjjpd10JiAUAdg-lHyxdA>
Subject: Re: [lamps] Proposed addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter
X-BeenThere: spasm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is a venue for discussion of doing Some Pkix And SMime \(spasm\) work." <spasm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spasm/>
List-Post: <mailto:spasm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm>, <mailto:spasm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2018 03:40:27 -0000

Hi Russ,

I support this work and would review the document.

Regards,
Quynh.

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 10:35 PM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

> In the session earlier today, there was interest in adding a header
> protection work item to the agenda.  Alexey talked about this in Montreal,
> and he posted a draft a few weeks ago:
> draft-melnikov-lamps-header-protection.  Several people said that they
> would implement a solution if the WG produced an RFC on this topic.
>
> Three questions:
>
> 1) Do you support the addition of this work to the LAMPS charter?
>
> 2) If it is added, would you review the document?
>
> 3) If it results in an RFC, would you implement?
>
> Russ & Tim
> _______________________________________________
> Spasm mailing list
> Spasm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spasm
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email