Re: [lamps] Draft addition of header protection to the LAMPS charter

[Hernâni Marques (p≡p project) <[e-mail]>]

Hello dkg & Russ & list

On 11.01.19 19:56, Russ Housley wrote:

> --- BEGIN DKG-2 ---
> 
> 7. Update the specification for the cryptographic protection of e-mail
> headers - both for signatures and encryption - to improve the
> implementation situation with respect to privacy, security and usability
> in cryptographically-protected electronic mail.  Most current
> implementations of cryptographically-protected electronic mail protect
> only the body of the message, which leaves significant room for attacks
> against otherwise-protected messages.
> 
> --- END DKG-2 ---

Thanks for the new suggestion!

Despite *email, I can live with that, but if there's no objection I
would also add interoperability to the list, such as to have the
following text:

--- BEGIN HM-1 ---

7. Update the specification for the cryptographic protection of email
headers -- both for signatures and encryption -- to improve the
implementation situation with respect to privacy, security, usability
and interoperability in cryptographically-protected electronic mail.
Most current implementations of cryptographically-protected electronic
mail protect only the body of the message, which leaves significant room
for attacks against otherwise-protected messages.

--- END HM-1 ---

Greets!