Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Boris Hassanov <bhassanov@yahoo.com> Fri, 30 April 2021 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <bhassanov@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8D63A1EF0 for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sO-BfAa3ZiGi for <spring@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sonic309-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com (sonic309-14.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com [74.6.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E3ED3A1EED for <spring@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 09:37:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1619800664; bh=O0EUqRzl8FfdMG8GwvIeW93B1dm6UY/mK1x6kUiflt0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=SakCzKcLQRb8UAzreSNZO+ykSuUARAUxiQHj1pTJu8n3IKKKtTSNiwvT9J2D+fAmlxtNk8nfVVF1iNDP0AWLn0hVniUCYgWYmfqOtoAcWsIwzBAcj8mLqHGtIKSXTCYMcNKPgDlLXSp56hsK3oFaKH0JQlf5Di7CcXsus5a/UY+4Oou7B79+6dzreY7y4vlLVXFBHwYrFVhEfEGcxqwr7iKmTTVC6qH166mmjeL/l33juztGjKww/AI0v7bUxFj4Iy0fNOU7pgBrM/EmM0mWOJt1EOrINEoRolDDRyrUyK3tIsdZcrrFTCDHTgiXjcaHAlqAa/ZCqd8dTRRfe5FqQQ==
X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1619800664; bh=oKFGpntMWp8KnTs08WRF1Um9rJroAPXdHlf6bO/C4F0=; h=X-Sonic-MF:Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=OKKBSchNTwb5V5H7UtfJPMepzSm7+JEbyo+XY7YkSemuVyLo4VC9B4ak/Qc+tPQcNWVTLrjQaPfkV37H01lAWB+mtdjn4Bees9yigA1uVz8sblzA4PNEqk8WP1yGtQtb9ZMh9qR28oRXLegbtuQZl9+T40neh7/XTPr8oCoxSQ5bZkfCo8WxFQ2NmAKcSgLgRmUOCzVQyqu4hPc++e0O/9JXYkcK7sj0UcSHeadidf3MI1YBIOTjB4MZ32MUZdlwn+MCGpNluDf6hFUMR5fzIW0fk7bZJ6nSaYuMrTEUX+DJaIXDtzCYBd5wMIa+RCW21Gfb8pAJXcHc+8Bxt7d27w==
X-YMail-OSG: owmNwwsVM1mDgtthzmwZPl0fvZ0fuNkurNrnW_aJD0u9gcH5yz4I0U7NFq0GF7T PH2FXLmA6C6r5MnvqB2mwkTqawbjri4ABQojsxJAdnvsAM72jddN89Xkcy1Nt2CAP0PPNBzBhN8n V1YWap6PCL9mMTWGBLdKpB1oWBIeukgWL0U1yes8H70pCD3O6s1lgfmPq9DCzEBz2y00DA681tHT jptebOr9g9VzxVnijZdG_aFX7myP.yNpJZh9.L.hNlXk.SGVhPiw6wSoejCiLjheNrh.uOJmmkxY pwK6NXnJurZfz5WUY0f5d.Pvm4C4KsYszDJbyJDmyyn9H74olqnJf6xYWUjdMy.LAA7tDXeQgg1d V1aQ1Ynz4Q3yrWL3U7j3AvbTeOrcLj0IPqQmTSTC.xJFuVQ5644b8jIP_r4tO.3rvpUPpg1EscrI O4wV25PlydcdzVp1S.OsiQy7LG..RvUqtCGTrRnzMI6xyu9XMC.99A.Qgyue6UGaN2xuNCscHFvY BZDf69_7dGMo91yQxwL.IcKCEx8l5UhDHq7Ez31Jg_MWKkiqmJ5ZjHULyyNAScT1pZPpV8pNZRUa AFHkv8G3JtmdBqe1TjGNc9Jj2hhXkbFhD.sYnVIxW1EWq5T9sumEIpPFSn.9ODSZ7bChpR3jtr1E ukE5klKjnkCJPmqu_HWRafYQh_pwoMMj..PKS4bCiW4Lwfr1lMeor3kxKUEFpuWYozRb1Z7e2eIR OOdxjDY513YnOoCgPDI4IO9w1qqUjG5klJVUkhHs8K.KhPshi1bW5Qavpi2HZrGAEwM6qHiUcr_M 6z__Hwytn4vwG0TImXEKcTgJEN2Hr.BPRIduLwBX.z5oQU2AtOkkjWBWDYt2afkMf4trD0Sif9XE bP62LWpaRyYVeBBluyCsS9UywtsHqJX1z2yGy83twnXgnRAnJ4ta7_L4Zi.TcS2t.mhLfLTqQ85x 7kDmq_rU0Lctxk0MTvUIGlC.z3_TDT77XafZOX8mB2papdbxSaxlgG00WqT8thKzlCdF.tlq7yDV jL63HtX73VwUFfjmGo_PmztquaiBzBvYy3ndWMSNz6tr7MAqvsGkSupI0RmPMn8HrpAU6.p6l_P1 wKOA7M2erL33i0VujVIO3m1LKs5J7_tcnz7jFNIibUTrCBa84gU.M_pyYVIaZCY8m37YZoJWjZCl J6lPXcpYDMYVbmqKrzsg_4ozyLnYFN3tmCglv3rb1jxJsefjX.f9AgqqNCrZCWIugV7XmZzvQWH0 FAaPQXcsB.vjYLYysFvb57m7WMlvMh4bmvOp1h4IeqE95bnQ8goIzJ90lDUGS89plIp7FiRQY7Da PNDKO3AIV_MNaJtkSIZBp8DPGe6oIlISbZjx2gLkM5.2yMQfreT65UCGyCtjbKmEeNi3dcluXkpD .KNqM1nxr4SZIJRQ1xZYGmsJG8bDaN1zHfX3CCQSH7nYFUBtvw_DX2weGF0ogqrLFx1vevdh42ic _7.OsYEp7rNX2JNG_0ygHCF_c5qLRnnheeufMTu8bYEt8L5lm6dJbuze9ant9zZGxydbtkobuJxG atT57n9vPs9uSqz1VaM3ZxbCGckgneRvZmn4NGMuz0WBN9Q5DcMhA2Tfvsjzxd2Z7F_eP8nD1ZMi muSgw5ykMJB9L0JcUqhyv9JMnJUSAjnXLrc.xVM6gvRiRBz8OJ1UZjOGurrZbrCF_kGHlRPjg0cY PIQuPqQlAdrmplpyc9__K5OcgsLdSpMb3LWzDL3KYXsW_jYdwaRY.QsWYm_MuvQAH6Wrx8I2ayoP osk_uUTjK_Ap7TaiPEeH7KlGxUltCTKvoAfsFEbwege3X51GapbyDNpbzdWpUmqc1elqYNdcr52S 1R.txekt1rDzw3u8aEDWvtsAm87KigldXS_IDDrrxUDMTc6yEtAt6Gm7DIaLOYUpW1j4Hg1gGnzy p13eYJAPTYYAOM4H.8PddX5ZNG3__5VZCNdbv8w6AYm3ccDfRhPViyOXAMws97aw.g0LjsIhZMxD NtMdKdvMei.7ildzo1sP8fSlmMkRH7_lwc5eO2s3vND.1pZtmCpkg_ho07ecOdyu2snuHWt2tRI1 HFfh9HEiOQFQGHLNPHP19rUS8NEcL3_olPFbVy9vuk.cmiJUur1rRDfHTRjDe4y7oRsm9IjZ5O1m CRKoNezo56bhxmZLtdNP3Dc6Xk5vdofjxKxZQigMUVv1vY3lKL3Da4ZDPLrnugKaP0izcBffbKF6 86g76pz_ZXyhafVFItWFVhcTLAFiTROa0qHmITdZEgWSGvYLEFhgwGcy9szxIGjLc8lTxpPYp62g DJ1V0cvXBiXjUwR4iAvzzje7mokLbzexWWuvc7hngcwsIvCadFpgYRskecrSeBtN55RAL0UfsUQ4 VUq1NqMd91fCIrpZ2ZqX7OOoP2NDdM0kPdkV6uMlTZYkCT_mm99eTJxUveKBqbQ7My_RsbgmRghm CycOLw52MGoRTDwp1dJ59Cwj5DfuJUcxxN1f1iDd.0i0DdSZOu8hAUSiiJPEM_vrAjFiVMcimxhz t2e3zrFtDOJVM6D3xsPIyvY7B2jqUY_xqTucl._QyW81k290NaSPM3Dn5eCdp6vlKAQXqh.zklqq yuMquBZmZiHcvLdRynX7oqLuD9_UXfWmGTxupVN58uqDlDGw71uQ6AlfcPLgd3Xn5bipThmSnFbS d_v4-
X-Sonic-MF: <bhassanov@yahoo.com>
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic309.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:37:44 +0000
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:37:38 +0000 (UTC)
From: Boris Hassanov <bhassanov@yahoo.com>
To: "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: "spring-chairs@ietf.org" <spring-chairs@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1165436835.1418589.1619800658701@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB457044275F37FD9E1145B143C15E9@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <MN2PR13MB4206EF1F6E9B1C01BDDCDD76D24D9@MN2PR13MB4206.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <256008865.754508.1619557990591@mail.yahoo.com> <MW3PR11MB457051E36837BB99BAB05C18C1409@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <210578080.1206207.1619795931098@mail.yahoo.com> <MW3PR11MB457044275F37FD9E1145B143C15E9@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_1418588_2112464125.1619800658697"
X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.18138 YMailNorrin Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/88.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/c19r6snPBcBwISXqbVLkx2yzM-Q>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:37:51 -0000

 Hi Ketan,
Surely. Regarding EANTC, yes, I read those reports but there are no many such implementation details.
Thx.

SY,Boris
    On Friday, April 30, 2021, 7:12:31 PM GMT+3, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:  
 
 #yiv3975518635 #yiv3975518635 -- _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv3975518635 #yiv3975518635 p.yiv3975518635MsoNormal, #yiv3975518635 li.yiv3975518635MsoNormal, #yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635MsoNormal {margin:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635 a:link, #yiv3975518635 span.yiv3975518635MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3975518635 pre {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv3975518635 p.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal, #yiv3975518635 li.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal, #yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635 p.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal, #yiv3975518635 li.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal, #yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635 span.yiv3975518635HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;}#yiv3975518635 span.yiv3975518635EmailStyle23 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv3975518635 .yiv3975518635MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635WordSection1 {}#yiv3975518635 
Hi Boris,
 
  
 
I will leave it the chair/shepherd guidance on this one.
 
  
 
EANTC has been running multi-vendor interop for Segment Routing that covers this document along with signalling protocols like PCEP and BGP-SRTE every year since at least 2016. It includes various controller and router products. Their results are published in whitepapers which might perhaps provide at least some of the information that you are looking.
 
  
 
Thanks,
 
Ketan
 
  
 
From: Boris Hassanov <bhassanov=40yahoo.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Sent: 30 April 2021 20:49
To: spring@ietf.org; James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>om>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com>
Cc: spring-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
 
  
 
Hi Ketan,
 
  
 
Yes, I meant an implementation status section in the draft.
 
The either one way, which will be easier to accomplish. We need to fix such status somewhere, IMO.
 
  
 
Thank you.
 
  
 
SY,
 
Boris
 
  
 
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021, 8:48:06 AM GMT+3, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: 
 
  
 
  
 
Hi Boris,
 
 
 
Thanks for your review and feedback.
 
 
 
Did you imply that we add an add an implementation status section in the draft?  Or are you suggesting that the chairs poll for implementation and deployment status? I ask because the Implementation Status section is generally removed before publication as RFC.
 
 
 
Regarding implementation, I am aware of support for this draft in Cisco’s Routing products for many years now with multiple deployments. I am also aware of other vendor support & operator deployment. However, would request other WG members to respond/confirm.
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Ketan
 
 
 
From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org>On Behalf Of Boris Hassanov
Sent: 28 April 2021 02:43
To: spring@ietf.org; James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
Cc: spring-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
 
 
 
Hi James and all,
 
 
 
I read the draft and strongly support its publication as WG document. Very detailed, helpful and interesting document.
 
I would only add implementation status part because currently it is not easy to get such info about implementation details.
 
 
 
Thank you.
 
 
 
SY,
 
Boris
 
 
 
On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 9:57:11 PM GMT+3, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
Dear WG:
 
 
 
This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].
 
 
 
Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021. 
 
 
 
If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
 
 
 
Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response to the IPR call in the previous email thread. 
 
 
 
Thanks!
 
 
 
Jim, Joel & Bruno
 
 
 [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/    
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
spring@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring