Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

[Boris Hassanov <[e-mail]>]

 Hi Ketan,
Surely. Regarding EANTC, yes, I read those reports but there are no many such implementation details.
Thx.

SY,Boris
    On Friday, April 30, 2021, 7:12:31 PM GMT+3, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant=[e-mail]> wrote:  
 
 #yiv3975518635 #yiv3975518635 -- _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {} _filtered {}#yiv3975518635 #yiv3975518635 p.yiv3975518635MsoNormal, #yiv3975518635 li.yiv3975518635MsoNormal, #yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635MsoNormal {margin:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635 a:link, #yiv3975518635 span.yiv3975518635MsoHyperlink {color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv3975518635 pre {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:10.0pt;}#yiv3975518635 p.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal, #yiv3975518635 li.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal, #yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394msonormal {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635 p.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal, #yiv3975518635 li.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal, #yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635ydp659101d9yiv3420978394ydpe9939475yiv7878076663msonormal {margin-right:0cm;margin-left:0cm;font-size:11.0pt;font-family:sans-serif;}#yiv3975518635 span.yiv3975518635HTMLPreformattedChar {font-family:Consolas;}#yiv3975518635 span.yiv3975518635EmailStyle23 {font-family:sans-serif;color:windowtext;}#yiv3975518635 .yiv3975518635MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered {}#yiv3975518635 div.yiv3975518635WordSection1 {}#yiv3975518635 
Hi Boris,
 
  
 
I will leave it the chair/shepherd guidance on this one.
 
  
 
EANTC has been running multi-vendor interop for Segment Routing that covers this document along with signalling protocols like PCEP and BGP-SRTE every year since at least 2016. It includes various controller and router products. Their results are published in whitepapers which might perhaps provide at least some of the information that you are looking.
 
  
 
Thanks,
 
Ketan
 
  
 
From: Boris Hassanov <bhassanov=[e-mail]>
Sent: 30 April 2021 20:49
To: [e-mail]; James Guichard <[e-mail]>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
 
  
 
Hi Ketan,
 
  
 
Yes, I meant an implementation status section in the draft.
 
The either one way, which will be easier to accomplish. We need to fix such status somewhere, IMO.
 
  
 
Thank you.
 
  
 
SY,
 
Boris
 
  
 
On Wednesday, April 28, 2021, 8:48:06 AM GMT+3, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant=[e-mail]> wrote: 
 
  
 
  
 
Hi Boris,
 
 
 
Thanks for your review and feedback.
 
 
 
Did you imply that we add an add an implementation status section in the draft?  Or are you suggesting that the chairs poll for implementation and deployment status? I ask because the Implementation Status section is generally removed before publication as RFC.
 
 
 
Regarding implementation, I am aware of support for this draft in Cisco’s Routing products for many years now with multiple deployments. I am also aware of other vendor support & operator deployment. However, would request other WG members to respond/confirm.
 
 
 
Thanks,
 
Ketan
 
 
 
From: spring <[e-mail]>On Behalf Of Boris Hassanov
Sent: 28 April 2021 02:43
To: [e-mail]; James Guichard <[e-mail]>
Cc: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
 
 
 
Hi James and all,
 
 
 
I read the draft and strongly support its publication as WG document. Very detailed, helpful and interesting document.
 
I would only add implementation status part because currently it is not easy to get such info about implementation details.
 
 
 
Thank you.
 
 
 
SY,
 
Boris
 
 
 
On Thursday, April 15, 2021, 9:57:11 PM GMT+3, James Guichard <[e-mail]> wrote: 
 
 
 
 
 
Dear WG:
 
 
 
This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].
 
 
 
Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021. 
 
 
 
If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
 
 
 
Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response to the IPR call in the previous email thread. 
 
 
 
Thanks!
 
 
 
Jim, Joel & Bruno
 
 
 [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/    
 
 
 
 
_______________________________________________
spring mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring