Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Thanks Ketan-san, yes it looks good to me.

Cheers,
--satoru

> On Apr 29, 2021, at 23:14, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Satoru-san,
>  
> Thanks for your review and comment.
>  
> I believe your point is to also cover SRv6 BSID and to that I would propose the following text :
>  
> When the active candidate path has a specified BSID, the SR Policy uses that BSID if this value (label in MPLS, IPv6 address in SRv6) is available (i.e., not associated with any other usage: e.g. to another MPLS client, to another SRv6 client, to another SID, to another SR Policy, outside the range of SRv6 Locators).
>  
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>  
> From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima
> Sent: 29 April 2021 18:36
> To: spring-chairs@ietf.org
> Cc: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>; spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
>  
> Hi spring chairs, 
>  
> I think that the document is ready to move forward.
>  
> Here one minor comment is bellow:
>  
> Section 6.2 says on BSID as follow:
>  
>    When the active candidate path has a specified BSID, the SR Policy
>    uses that BSID if this value (label in MPLS, IPv6 address in SRv6) is
>    available (i.e., not associated with any other usage: e.g. to another
>    MPLS client, to another SID, to another SR Policy).
>  
> My suggestion for that above text as follow:
>  
>    When the active candidate path has a specified BSID, the SR Policy
>    uses that BSID if this value (label in MPLS, IPv6 address in SRv6) is
>    available (i.e., not associated with any other usage: e.g. to another
>    MPLS client, to another SID, to another SR Policy, within the range of locators in SRv6).
>  
> Best regards,
> --satoru
> 
> 
> On Apr 16, 2021, at 3:57, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear WG:
>  
> This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].
>  
> Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021.
>  
> If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
>  
> Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response to the IPR call in the previous email thread.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Jim, Joel & Bruno
>  
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring