Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy

Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com> Thu, 29 April 2021 23:29 UTC

Return-Path: <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AD03A17D1; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-2zV-dvYwkV; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FD083A17C8; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id z16so7304711pga.1; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:29:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to :date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=QTTDkB9jNCD5CvPjj7Ik1g1Oa+vFCdLioCE6fnfdstI=; b=uKESWvtDqq57i3Aa38YMcK9UV3ZFMeEDvcsFNSMuossFlW18Y7dSFfeSj2hPvz7u8D z14S9hZ0vxPzI/uoO+q8Ttrc6Zkcl43wAMxzNDhabF00lcwRFmbf0gyhDnLCZMYjZDRs 6qCR7GGKJGbzaaWOzy3dIaWBwBkJY/tJsG2QO/YyEkVf5p8Kyll4g2bUO3Fa9+pSUEWD /q3nlWcagjLUykFVLRMqx+DbB4kZUUAxneDibWQtvQwkrcV7wGrF/46fE+bHBc3eX4UK R+uB3/52KUwYTSB1OXuLo+e72H7KPYLKzE5hfOeCimtTeWu2aXLg/KT06WyD3i1AJNz2 piIQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject :from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references:to; bh=QTTDkB9jNCD5CvPjj7Ik1g1Oa+vFCdLioCE6fnfdstI=; b=LIvszy953MZHsXxf0hC5hmwITWbPuLWOFIQBePuU8thQ21QQDeGO4aqHB0fDQ60F7q ECd6zB//+Os8cSep3Kaha+JJViEIfZ+PJnl8SQqlf2w+QCb2llOI23UBr6z3lPJK/aG7 bWXMd74lfoR5/Sj8b6WZue64Mm0G+bJhNb47otpkWl79hvBNT1SVMpaiQ96nEyS2buHF M1mzavhw9iezKBxjP8WqaBQBymEyj3IqO4nc8kN2ryPKuozak+g+7fU2MfjrCZj42DGg kjYJUBKI/bMG+nMQ81fYXXAo3W2vj8dspd2URADuVLWR96szrywGXyaae/sATxq2JNrZ RAJQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336Myo6UZhYl+fkLfvabe78jdRtXGBiH7qjm7aCT2JBURhGjb4E TbDLZYZE+7df0hnlMDeozpM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwRB/4aqxQNi0Syb5sYEk33/lOb1yo98G6aVdgl+6pPLJK84OUNztT7iwWCeVBEiiNNexsguw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:cf57:: with SMTP id b23mr1979414pgj.328.1619738941381; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:29:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2400:2411:8900:0:1de2:9c27:b58d:f661? ([2400:2411:8900:0:1de2:9c27:b58d:f661]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b5sm1178500pgb.0.2021.04.29.16.29.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 16:29:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7AA2A0E0-E7CB-4828-9332-E4728D82C0FD
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Satoru Matsushima <satoru.matsushima@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <MW3PR11MB4570B3A8816BF089F6D3C19CC15F9@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 08:28:58 +0900
Cc: spring-chairs@ietf.org, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, spring@ietf.org
Message-Id: <853166DF-7EFB-4AB1-99EF-4A59A658636A@gmail.com>
References: <MW3PR11MB4570B3A8816BF089F6D3C19CC15F9@MW3PR11MB4570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
To: "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <ketant@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (18D70)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/izXUUNs8tyTBKLMX4Su4zdMYXN8>
Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 23:29:08 -0000

Thanks Ketan-san, yes it looks good to me.

Cheers,
--satoru

> On Apr 29, 2021, at 23:14, Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <ketant@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi Satoru-san,
>  
> Thanks for your review and comment.
>  
> I believe your point is to also cover SRv6 BSID and to that I would propose the following text :
>  
> When the active candidate path has a specified BSID, the SR Policy uses that BSID if this value (label in MPLS, IPv6 address in SRv6) is available (i.e., not associated with any other usage: e.g. to another MPLS client, to another SRv6 client, to another SID, to another SR Policy, outside the range of SRv6 Locators).
>  
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>  
> From: spring <spring-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Satoru Matsushima
> Sent: 29 April 2021 18:36
> To: spring-chairs@ietf.org
> Cc: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>om>; spring@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [spring] WGLC for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy
>  
> Hi spring chairs, 
>  
> I think that the document is ready to move forward.
>  
> Here one minor comment is bellow:
>  
> Section 6.2 says on BSID as follow:
>  
>    When the active candidate path has a specified BSID, the SR Policy
>    uses that BSID if this value (label in MPLS, IPv6 address in SRv6) is
>    available (i.e., not associated with any other usage: e.g. to another
>    MPLS client, to another SID, to another SR Policy).
>  
> My suggestion for that above text as follow:
>  
>    When the active candidate path has a specified BSID, the SR Policy
>    uses that BSID if this value (label in MPLS, IPv6 address in SRv6) is
>    available (i.e., not associated with any other usage: e.g. to another
>    MPLS client, to another SID, to another SR Policy, within the range of locators in SRv6).
>  
> Best regards,
> --satoru
> 
> 
> On Apr 16, 2021, at 3:57, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Dear WG:
>  
> This email starts a 2 week Working Group Last Call for draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy [1].
>  
> Please read this document if you haven’t read the most recent version and send your comments to the SPRING WG list no later than April 29th 2021.
>  
> If you are raising a point which you expect will be specifically debated on the mailing list, consider using a specific email/thread for this point.
>  
> Lastly, if you are an author or contributors for this document please response to the IPR call in the previous email thread.
>  
> Thanks!
>  
> Jim, Joel & Bruno
>  
> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-policy/
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring