IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spring] Resignation request

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Tue, 03 March 2020 12:32 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: spring@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 837FA3A1E92; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:32:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XzwIA1aUWFV9; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:32:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32b.google.com (mail-wm1-x32b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CE223A1E94; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32b.google.com with SMTP id p9so2965435wmc.2; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 04:32:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Exc1pE4kfHS4oIFWLTfrUymxP8jgrIAtek7fDCBlt9Q=; b=O/gcPV1XzFJoUSYFKZCd32mJzQKVTgb+6KiveKaB4vFKdlVhwd76/wvQIlgiYeeeie qVErJd/4EyTSWy2VJP0f2x0QxS2s7IEXRPTbT0gHXD2f00jEPaD53x8Xh3dqoa7LNswx YUb34NWRrauiYmtmFtwgXmCYkm+fG8OWOqf894oBmW/zlk+eLka7Ost43roTBnL5owPP K7IKXMFawV58QpNucYebiPRSMWp3NFZbJJggNBvVyyWLQGW+ZjhNOH8FPHaT/TQaH45C pUKjpffiXHRhfMTu0bQncssQLp2SaNKyrp6856t2AB8gqno+slqbXi18Wq/VqYitWjoO X0Vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=Exc1pE4kfHS4oIFWLTfrUymxP8jgrIAtek7fDCBlt9Q=; b=SY6PZNcOaM99TnWxpCcujUp1CtcT60Dw0NYrcMc8wnLUCn4b9cHjYk8bFOcXTBc8kH u/VKo4s897rB39FLxvL2ty3hrXDVhG4L/Z9yifeernD0EMHRU4ryM5ql5UAkAKF3QxNb euS1W4+ueqmEJbYwYmB+8gzPLQEosyiTFzuv5r3uzuy4gY6MEn+YmpoVWW5YIuwy5Nt9 Hj7O6MyTVwgLKubicWsbTv589rFu+Wihss0wP37P/zr8cXwWdVpdQnJQ9uvB8Q3MN6Im UNuvWVvVymZ48L8ODtMfPt2wvHHtVWuHBE+s/YEHZ4gD/bAjwU14tgsSDkmxqJ+kHtxD 1mVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0aupQJGZ0/C33JvNMBCpRDiJ6KaMuDJI5lpxDaUbu9CXMjW1GR l/Qh5pdwP+QcKlyeget2N/w=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vsjqug3RZD+ou/znnqo24PsqyluNFGGgj/9lJrViaaQLlmM+KLGpDp7Xrh3flooyDjGql1COw==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:25c6:: with SMTP id l189mr4192320wml.104.1583238739642; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 04:32:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from appleton.fritz.box ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q16sm17659200wrj.73.2020.03.03.04.32.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Mar 2020 04:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <C7B7787A-48E5-407F-9E81-BDEC2F1B2169@steffann.nl>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 12:32:17 +0000
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <6651697D-A892-4CAB-BDC1-E385750294D3@gmail.com>
References: <3EF6505C-D442-41A4-A681-26ACF818BB4D@sobco.com> <C7B7787A-48E5-407F-9E81-BDEC2F1B2169@steffann.nl>
To: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/spring/eFeMgXCbsmOsX1smZxviSTWt_Iw>
Subject: Re: [spring] Resignation request
X-BeenThere: spring@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Source Packet Routing in NetworkinG \(SPRING\)" <spring.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/spring/>
List-Post: <mailto:spring@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring>, <mailto:spring-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 12:32:24 -0000


> On 2 Mar 2020, at 21:43, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> I have no information about the situation but I do not understand why an AD would be declaring consensus in any case - 
>> that is normally the responsibility of WG chairs.  see RFC 2418 section 3.3 
> 
> The only active/available WG chair was a co-author of this draft.
> 
> Cheers,
> Sander
> 
> 


As a WGC that has been in a position where the chairs had a CoI, I(we) asked the WG Secretary to manage the document, and that is what other WGs do. Look at the DetNet data plane drafts as an example. That means that the decision is taken at the lowest level and leaves the AD continue in the oversight role.

Anyway from the discussion on the list this probably need to go for review by the other two RTG ADs to check that they are happy with the decision or to recommend some other action.

- Stewart

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status