IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] WGLC: draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-09

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Tue, 10 May 2022 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A37C15E3EC for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:37:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7lADeX40NODe for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28935C1595E2 for <stir@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2022 12:37:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2E3115B19; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB0A31156F4; Tue, 10 May 2022 15:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.21\))
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <AA004957-4AE5-4B30-9EF4-E161E22FAF47@vigilsec.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 15:37:12 -0400
Cc: IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8619BAAE-385A-4B84-90D5-78039A49F0CF@vigilsec.com>
References: <5393b70d-bfc7-c8ac-eb8d-30c8087a1e89@nostrum.com> <6981C79A-4024-4291-B2BB-A969EF8FD930@vigilsec.com> <AA004957-4AE5-4B30-9EF4-E161E22FAF47@vigilsec.com>
To: Chris Wendt <chris-ietf@chriswendt.net>, Jon Peterson <jon.peterson@neustar.biz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/KjmT9Xw1wxwa6YoR51p5fGhqmHc>
Subject: Re: [stir] WGLC: draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-09
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 May 2022 19:37:22 -0000

I found a new concern while working to the shepherd writeup:

     Compact form of an "rcd" PASSporT claim has some restrictions that
     will be enumerated below, but mainly follows standard PASSporT compact
     form procedures.  For re-construction of the "nam" claim the string for
     the display-name in the From header field. "jcl" and "jcd" MAY NOT be
     used with compact form due to integrity rules and URI reference rules in
     this specification leading to too restrictive of a set of constraints. 
     Future specifications may revisit this to propose a consisent and
     comprehensive way of addressing integrity and security of information.

s/MAY NOT/MUST NOT/

Russ


> On May 10, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
> 
> I saw a few nits raised, but nothing more.  Authors, do you want to respond to the nits on list?  The do not seem to be blocking.
> 
> I will start the shepherd writeup.
> 
> For the STIR WG Chairs,
> Russ
> 
> 
>> On Apr 25, 2022, at 3:51 PM, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> This might be the longest WG Last Call in history ....
>> 
>> A new version was just posted: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-17.txt
>> 
>> Regarding the ongoing WG Last Call, we have two questions:
>> 
>> (1) Have any of the changes introduced new issues?
>> 
>> (2) Have all previously raised issues are resolved?
>> 
>> For the STIR WG Chairs,
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 8, 2020, at 4:30 PM, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This is a WGLC for draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-09.
>>> 
>>> Please send reviews to the list by the end of day 22 Dec 2020.
>>> 
>>> If you plan to provide a review but need more time, please let us know early.
>>> 
>>> See <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd/>
>>> 
>>> RjS

_______________________________________________
stir mailing list
stir@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email