Re: [stir] WGLC: draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-09

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

Authors:

There are two references that are listed as normative references, but looking carefully at the sentences that contain the reference, I think they can be informational references.

Please take a look at [RFC3325] and [RFC7340].  Do you agree that these can be informational?

Also, there is an obsolete normative reference to [RFC4627].  This is obsoleted by RFC 7158 and RFC 7159.

Please update the reference.

Russ


> On May 10, 2022, at 3:30 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Authors:
> 
> Adding entries to the IANA "JSON Web Token Claims" registry requires a three-week review period on the [e-mail] mailing list
> 
> Three new JSON Web Token Claims are defined. They are listed in Section 17.1.  Have these been raised on the [e-mail] mailing list?
> 
> Russ
> 
> 
>> On May 10, 2022, at 3:08 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> I saw a few nits raised, but nothing more.  Authors, do you want to respond to the nits on list?  The do not seem to be blocking.
>> 
>> I will start the shepherd writeup.
>> 
>> For the STIR WG Chairs,
>> Russ
>> 
>> 
>>> On Apr 25, 2022, at 3:51 PM, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> This might be the longest WG Last Call in history ....
>>> 
>>> A new version was just posted: https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-17.txt
>>> 
>>> Regarding the ongoing WG Last Call, we have two questions:
>>> 
>>> (1) Have any of the changes introduced new issues?
>>> 
>>> (2) Have all previously raised issues are resolved?
>>> 
>>> For the STIR WG Chairs,
>>> Russ
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On Dec 8, 2020, at 4:30 PM, Robert Sparks <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> This is a WGLC for draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd-09.
>>>> 
>>>> Please send reviews to the list by the end of day 22 Dec 2020.
>>>> 
>>>> If you plan to provide a review but need more time, please let us know early.
>>>> 
>>>> See <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-stir-passport-rcd/>
>>>> 
>>>> RjS