IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Sun, 17 March 2024 00:55 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F21C14F69D for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:55:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TPH3H-C12Xqm for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62c.google.com (mail-ej1-x62c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D8FC14F5F1 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62c.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a28cfca3c45so70162266b.1 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1710636955; x=1711241755; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QE134uYCCvzOtcXsKfUoRSPpnTiKRCeFICQLdJlgOkQ=; b=eiuQPWpk408QqeuhxJhiFmT7kQNU4RdM0E+KI+lxsBVcSVrdYkWvXUs4xaHQBH1LhR 9EcKeoQKi8zwP/84OyfKdBHfdpWJBPku23GWubwb7+T1UBnrxU5TrxDdKwJrn+h0sF7L tNvwVWDs4d3xCSIRroB9Tm5MAROPrdFbcQtxtsd5+r042T6PXU8ev6DhUwKyR9+s4tZH Uee4cL7jfbWkK6ljcxpdVNLpLWYmBD9qPEnOVZIhv2UgzmAlibfX4TeyHRGgBcywhAIa V46Wp0prWrgHb/M4r8oZXIH2KJVe8I4I2Pnc5TTilrQ+qgrfMOKctdKrjgO2MxcoHHbJ ARHQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710636955; x=1711241755; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QE134uYCCvzOtcXsKfUoRSPpnTiKRCeFICQLdJlgOkQ=; b=LTt5P5WRpm5EHc1WXodzPBQJm3QjjPieoaoIb+xbY/1oV55T4KKYWyczZ89a70BZaD +NiS1WZudwj7jpOVpkSmDf0N4QDrjWQWC5F4mC/y7p2VLix0086EpYMrukMT/Qaiy7pz /PVF/WY5hSRiVMkPbrjFOvK1b9IJ5OGrTLFPGvwI6SK7y38HQRZwp9p8ba2i1Ji4rGyV eAtAo7vlirZeThX/THpklXWjvywCyqsXKiFji1g3PRMUDeu1m9zmOj1qjGQH3ZCOt3mT biRiFy80Qpr3yqSNFX00aCqD40rnXuC3O3r4VHLZQ5x2ytH4OCEvxobRfhgtA+NdW5vh qBfw==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWngj4tdG3bS93DT06MaalP7H00zMveQUmGO4ZfvliJ7pSRZ9V7y9A98G3uv9idwcqbsMZcV1sgUMdwZpig
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YybdBOb5I/O73fZLOdCFVh7PVUL8mD5S0dkVyDCkejbvZhsRrPA WrQDtY+opBF/bgS3tCUttTN9t4FUFAZ/Gui8T7ZTpvxNhFREpoYeW+OuqUWp6A3RoNGdNL/JZay RvG+GDJLJp/e3+YjUK1xhO0QaNJs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE8ckt6YnKEdHsrwuAtV730K6X5Ybz7gIqe1Ge7PFd+jeikjXz+c2Dm1Tb2bsVgtZfHvj8TxXSg1x2GN8lOTSY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5393:b0:a45:d9db:9275 with SMTP id g19-20020a170906539300b00a45d9db9275mr5390579ejo.1.1710636955394; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170689342892.43577.13483715713883494287@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwb9LUsGuj4AwczOne9GCTT6NvuZJyZYPaeaZdRvaFGUzQ@mail.gmail.com> <97C689F5-C32D-4EAF-AC76-942CB3296341@shockey.us> <01E7796C-203A-4344-A656-EF85817B0E35@nostrum.com> <0D740856-CBE3-446F-B953-363DAC625558@shockey.us> <CH3PR13MB67474302850984AE2B8723C8E12B2@CH3PR13MB6747.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <77BCC004-8794-4C24-99FE-3D34001DEF5E@shockey.us> <CH3PR13MB674769F00AFF5F6F58E44D7EE12A2@CH3PR13MB6747.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <0D0ADAF6-967E-4D8B-BC78-450BC9733A8B@shockey.us> <CAL0qLwY-hCHP7k-tdrZg6icJ64CbL21btg-XsJkpBEvB9yRK+Q@mail.gmail.com> <3BE21F04-2FA6-4B4F-B625-93B4CF49CAA2@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <3BE21F04-2FA6-4B4F-B625-93B4CF49CAA2@vigilsec.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:55:43 +1000
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwb40w9mNrPfigS_DW1dErj14g28fpRNORoXqkBUA7p8tA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, Pierce Gorman <Pierce.Gorman@numeracle.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000010eaa20613d0b42c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/apSb9waH4V9YIQ-DKeph_WonSBs>
Subject: Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:55:59 -0000

On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:50 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Mar 16, 2024, at 8:47 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:48 AM Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> OOB just sucks. I do not know one carrier that wants to implement it
>>
>
> The shepherd writeup for this document claims:
>
>    The shepherd is aware of multiple non-public implementation efforts, but
>    is not aware of any publicly available reports.
>
> Are these two claims in conflict?  If so, which is right?
>
>
> I do not see a conflict.  People have said that they are doing
> implementations, but they are not sharing any details or interoperability
> reports.
>

Hi Russ,

So there are implementations, but none by carriers?  Or are you disagreeing
with Richard's claim?

-MSK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email