IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05

Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Sun, 17 March 2024 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4ED5C14F5FD for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:38:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.906
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.906 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (768-bit key) header.d=shockey.us
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hUl2KJJb_QvL for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta034.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta034.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F84CC14F5F6 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 09:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eig-obgw-5002a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.29.215]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id lJrQrMsNys4yTltWdrP1kL; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:38:19 +0000
Received: from box5527.bluehost.com ([162.241.218.19]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id ltVErhLgUJGCFltVErMzHo; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:36:52 +0000
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=RZCWCUtv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65f71c24 a=KXpOjjFwo8kCkgxs2x2AJQ==:117 a=KXpOjjFwo8kCkgxs2x2AJQ==:17 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=K6JAEmCyrfEA:10 a=qMgonR0qfJAA:10 a=PeFO9FbFhS32YxYntvkA:9 a=ll-iCDY8AAAA:8 a=M0OflfRGAAAA:8 a=Z80JlwQ0AAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=tGX7uwomAAAA:8 a=gYdj9CMZAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=eZY0wQkSIMGYK3IRfOEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=X-aAQs0CHs0A:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=6O30svk12G_FIujFX2kA:9 a=NGozVkMW7yFOsv0h:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=lqcHg5cX4UMA:10 a=VpyrLIdO_Ztbr3SWPBuH:22 a=6yl0mh0s51TKORVA8GqK:22 a=Zz-tw7mMPhxMdvFcggwQ:22 a=ZFOOzkjxzLGrPE5HuMia:22 a=HE9wkd683oz8aKaGCqil:22 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22 a=jqBRFv0mrdWfL_K7jfQc:22
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-type:Mime-version:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:CC: To:From:Subject:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ThH/5XxPG2uNBqUZF84Yd7vqmbh57pPuPNASodh+wWM=; b=S4DkJB6/ZFaLzQQg5GhrZr4xoo UlKvheVlQkQI304m/RC//bH+B2qZE1MXqRupz5WfgANY0dX9y3uHGCY2G9nexmcT+GdkYLKlh8L0B 53xrWyItygDH8LNaqa5575vjb;
Received: from pool-100-36-48-45.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([100.36.48.45]:49510 helo=[192.168.1.214]) by box5527.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1rltDG-001iUp-0P; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:18:18 -0600
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.83.24031120
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 12:18:15 -0400
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
CC: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Pierce Gorman <Pierce.Gorman@numeracle.com>, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <D2590863-B9F1-481F-A909-0A7E7B1867F3@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05
References: <170689342892.43577.13483715713883494287@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwb9LUsGuj4AwczOne9GCTT6NvuZJyZYPaeaZdRvaFGUzQ@mail.gmail.com> <97C689F5-C32D-4EAF-AC76-942CB3296341@shockey.us> <01E7796C-203A-4344-A656-EF85817B0E35@nostrum.com> <0D740856-CBE3-446F-B953-363DAC625558@shockey.us> <CH3PR13MB67474302850984AE2B8723C8E12B2@CH3PR13MB6747.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <77BCC004-8794-4C24-99FE-3D34001DEF5E@shockey.us> <CH3PR13MB674769F00AFF5F6F58E44D7EE12A2@CH3PR13MB6747.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <0D0ADAF6-967E-4D8B-BC78-450BC9733A8B@shockey.us> <CAL0qLwY-hCHP7k-tdrZg6icJ64CbL21btg-XsJkpBEvB9yRK+Q@mail.gmail.com> <3BE21F04-2FA6-4B4F-B625-93B4CF49CAA2@vigilsec.com> <CAL0qLwb40w9mNrPfigS_DW1dErj14g28fpRNORoXqkBUA7p8tA@mail.gmail.com> <863E2FBF-73DC-4D52-B9B7-FD7AAEBFEEB8@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <863E2FBF-73DC-4D52-B9B7-FD7AAEBFEEB8@nostrum.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3793522698_245911987"
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5527.bluehost.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - shockey.us
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-IP: 100.36.48.45
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1rltDG-001iUp-0P
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: pool-100-36-48-45.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([192.168.1.214]) [100.36.48.45]:49510
X-Source-Auth: richard@shockey.us
X-Email-Count: 1
X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost;
X-Source-Cap: c2hvY2tleXU7c2hvY2tleXU7Ym94NTUyNy5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20=
X-Local-Domain: yes
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfD02ZEU3GN+gGzSLnh7gzvTEUTauZmoZTqDgqxYaPQNomFOrQZYEUpDKwDFaYXwt+aUmjIHKogV5aRtqdH5GRb1xMI7XoeD4tjT2rmuJpS+cJ09iLANz af5XA9Vps3S0r7gaZX6+Kmwam3t/ZRGxGYlOUdI7+VqxNqyrmIk/m/8B0tyrs/WuWyxUyXA0RxIr4w==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/vqYLC2g5hbaaW-3IVyGyDcRTm2A>
Subject: Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 16:38:25 -0000

 

I have no objections to the publication of the draft as a RFC.   

 

The IETF certainly has a number of RFC that cannot or will not ever be implemented. This is one of them.  This is the consensus view of every carrier I’ve spoken to about this. Not just the majors either. Many of the smaller rural carriers have implemented STIR/SHAKEN their problem has been negotiating IP interconnection agreements.

 

Of course there are proponents of OOB..typically the vendors who hope to profit from it.

 

This is ultimately a political issue.

 

 

Richard Shockey

Shockey Consulting LLC

Chairman of the Board SIP Forum

www.shockey.us

www.sipforum.org

richard<at>shockey.us

Skype-Linkedin-Facebook –Twitter  rshockey101

PSTN +1 703-593-2683

 

 

From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Date: Saturday, March 16, 2024 at 9:19 PM
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, Pierce Gorman <Pierce.Gorman@numeracle.com>, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05

 

 



On Mar 17, 2024, at 10:55 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:

 

On Sun, Mar 17, 2024 at 10:50 AM Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:

 



On Mar 16, 2024, at 8:47 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:

 

On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:48 AM Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> wrote:

 

OOB just sucks. I do not know one carrier that wants to implement it

 

The shepherd writeup for this document claims:
   The shepherd is aware of multiple non-public implementation efforts, but
   is not aware of any publicly available reports.
Are these two claims in conflict?  If so, which is right?
 

I do not see a conflict.  People have said that they are doing implementations, but they are not sharing any details or interoperability reports.

 

Hi Russ,

 

So there are implementations, but none by carriers?  Or are you disagreeing with Richard's claim?

 

There are vendor implementations or plans for implementations. Carriers may or may not deploy them. I suspect Richard (who I hope will correct me if I am wrong) is referring to “major” or “top-tier carriers”, but the full set of STIR/SHAKEN stakeholders is considerably larger and more diverse than just the major carriers. There are certainly proponents for OOB solutions in the ATIS Non-IP Call Authentication group.

 

But in any case, I think the discussion has turned to politics and market forces, which are not really in scope for STIR. My opinion as chair is that the working group has _rough_ consensus to publish it. Certainly not perfect consensus.

 

Thanks!

 

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email