IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05

Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> Sun, 17 March 2024 00:50 UTC

Return-Path: <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Original-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C48A8C14F5E0 for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=vigilsec.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sfXkRQD1gNrj for <stir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (mail3.g24.pair.com [66.39.134.11]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB14EC14F5E5 for <stir@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 17:50:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail3.g24.pair.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA190F26B0; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:50:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (pfs.iad.rg.net [198.180.150.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail3.g24.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0221AF2C0A; Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:50:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Message-Id: <3BE21F04-2FA6-4B4F-B625-93B4CF49CAA2@vigilsec.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_DB9AA23D-1FDE-4184-8FFD-337940912E07"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\))
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:50:26 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY-hCHP7k-tdrZg6icJ64CbL21btg-XsJkpBEvB9yRK+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, Pierce Gorman <Pierce.Gorman@numeracle.com>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, IETF STIR Mail List <stir@ietf.org>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
References: <170689342892.43577.13483715713883494287@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAL0qLwb9LUsGuj4AwczOne9GCTT6NvuZJyZYPaeaZdRvaFGUzQ@mail.gmail.com> <97C689F5-C32D-4EAF-AC76-942CB3296341@shockey.us> <01E7796C-203A-4344-A656-EF85817B0E35@nostrum.com> <0D740856-CBE3-446F-B953-363DAC625558@shockey.us> <CH3PR13MB67474302850984AE2B8723C8E12B2@CH3PR13MB6747.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <77BCC004-8794-4C24-99FE-3D34001DEF5E@shockey.us> <CH3PR13MB674769F00AFF5F6F58E44D7EE12A2@CH3PR13MB6747.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <0D0ADAF6-967E-4D8B-BC78-450BC9733A8B@shockey.us> <CAL0qLwY-hCHP7k-tdrZg6icJ64CbL21btg-XsJkpBEvB9yRK+Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=vigilsec.com; h=from:message-id:content-type:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to:references; s=pair-202402141609; bh=5bdimUPovcuPYK+7fXYxO81PkO0j2pBqUsrtr+VSNHk=; b=kuE8ZV8ost/xMK3kyKv9XccjUqB/WSbu6ojzJC1+7b3XfWeLOC/iJI5+JNUPFH1FZUfMqLfXO3FirzSei42sjcFLmjyZtnUnPeEofZAIeImfSipnHQphRKRR9i5ek0yRg5lYPebbf9OSsuxzSYLBZqy8E9C3m42L8qljlITphlfHP6NhAfHcGWp5tZJVClN4hxJ0pus0xCgOWqMORL4bMwXpdLbIJeaRbjJTafToGdKXa5jLFaM+qh+S+OSRm2GGazNGt3FwB21Ew8Nqiy7Zi9xDOJsgXYgl7hjrM+WDEGwGIKSjaMZ0hou5NdxGzvmv8ldKO5lb6kZ6UOg7XtzzHg==
X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.11 on 66.39.134.11
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stir/kX2XD_7xSKiLcpXjobn3xz6qIU8>
Subject: Re: [stir] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-stir-servprovider-oob-05
X-BeenThere: stir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Telephone Identity Revisited <stir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stir/>
List-Post: <mailto:stir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir>, <mailto:stir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 00:50:45 -0000


> On Mar 16, 2024, at 8:47 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 8:48 AM Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us <mailto:richard@shockey.us>> wrote:
>>  
>> OOB just sucks. I do not know one carrier that wants to implement it
>> 
> 
> The shepherd writeup for this document claims:
>    The shepherd is aware of multiple non-public implementation efforts, but
>    is not aware of any publicly available reports.
> Are these two claims in conflict?  If so, which is right?

I do not see a conflict.  People have said that they are doing implementations, but they are not sharing any details or interoperability reports.

Russ

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email