Re: [stir] Permitted spoofing

I agree, the point is to prevent bad calls.  I understand that following calls back through CDRs  is very difficult and time consuming from the point of view of the law enforcement agency doing the tracking.  That's why Henning would like us to come up with a way of automating that traceback.

Brian

On Jun 8, 2013, at 3:02 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <hadriel.kaplan@oracle.com> wrote:

> 
> I think the hope was to proactively prevent a bogus call from succeeding, as opposed to reactively hunting down the perpetrators after it happened.  The latter case should be possible now, since CDRs record enough to backtrack to the upstream provider, and that provider's CDRs can find its upstream provider, etc.
> 
> -hadriel
> 
> 
> On Jun 8, 2013, at 2:30 PM, Michael Hammer <michael.hammer@yaanatech.com> wrote:
> 
>> Question:  Do we really care how many redirections occurred in the middle
>> network hops if we know what the original source of the signaling was?
>> 
>> Put another way, if we have a legitimate scape-goat for a problem call, do
>> you need to catch all the stooges all at once?
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stir mailing list
> stir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stir