Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt

"Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 07 September 2016 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: stox@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A30712B3E9 for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.408
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.408 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.508] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZVdUuH-0d6cZ for <stox@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23A3C12B283 for <stox@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Sep 2016 14:00:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.21] (cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u87L05DS002320 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 7 Sep 2016 16:00:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-7-22.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.7.22] claimed to be [10.0.1.21]
From: "Ben Campbell" <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "Peter Saint-Andre" <stpeter@stpeter.im>, "=?utf-8?q?Sa=C3=BAl?= Ibarra =?utf-8?q?Corretg=C3=A9?=" <saul@ag-projects.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 16:00:04 -0500
Message-ID: <0C304BC3-0AD3-48C4-958B-AC44122892D7@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <76151e8b-9abf-7587-c36d-e2bf38180245@stpeter.im>
References: <147241625250.24476.13333521107304467910.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a139f13c-9745-0d86-853b-d5d6b8c9124c@stpeter.im> <E1C65C7E-CDFF-40BC-AF01-B2F029B64E6E@nostrum.com> <931fcd90-11c8-0b58-b3ad-eb6e7be2557e@stpeter.im> <f12534a1-bdce-925f-3358-c22975dd3bbe@stpeter.im> <512b8d52-68e1-2bdd-d153-20e24fbb73de@stpeter.im> <B197ACCC-5DB0-4C8F-8C54-1159A89B1796@nostrum.com> <969223de-c09e-eba5-a4a3-4969539c807e@stpeter.im> <87BE83BB-946B-4833-A34C-D890E783F214@nostrum.com> <76151e8b-9abf-7587-c36d-e2bf38180245@stpeter.im>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; markup=markdown
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.5r5260)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/stox/xkIUSdq_lLuRf6ARVyrRpEJUIIs>
Cc: stox@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Stox] I-D Action: draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: stox@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP-TO-XMPP Working Group discussion list <stox.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/stox/>
List-Post: <mailto:stox@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/stox>, <mailto:stox-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2016 21:00:11 -0000

(+ shepherd)

On 7 Sep 2016, at 15:50, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:

> If so, I think we can take that
>> version to IETF last call.
>
> Great! The document shepherd might need to update his writeup.

On a quick scan, I think the shepherd writeup is okay, but we should let 
Saul verify that (and also confirm that he agrees this is ready to go to 
last call.)

Saul, do you agree on on both (or either)?

Thanks!

Ben.