IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning

Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org> Wed, 03 February 2010 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <alangley@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787B228C0E3 for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:47:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d+tGpJGQRbPj for <tcpm@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:47:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-f201.google.com (mail-yw0-f201.google.com [209.85.211.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0DB3A6C99 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:47:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ywh39 with SMTP id 39so4405428ywh.17 for <tcpm@ietf.org>; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:48:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=jcqXrr2dyhjz0fdfw37HnMTkKSMnfG/5pKG7V+QJ2sw=; b=QwxLNXS47/oOEtgEoxqSEKK08+IkvJyWNzp/XbJq0JKpVtXB/6TmmKgiLuT2Zv0Jzj ksu7bQqv9Z1Z9FDVuXdRGrd1vqDIKXS7idDlVVeYj2tNRqCYqkAZaKBYhuBtxc1rf/Qw 6fryCtTkhDpNfoMSzERbz9u7V0YCfO8rOk52k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=dPqMCmIzHfLv3OZ2NoBQChmrwcp+r4/dFAlELBC4fM7y1pCe9jLrPAHDJIiA2GTfZf vgqBR5wNxQB4MdZ6q2eV7qlTKs/ZXSMB3N8kENYnS8D+PZb2tLI+YZ0AgwWT5juHZmlR 6iY8YOxBXheNUHWwAcM5AhLZ0fIEM7pKS2d20=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: alangley@gmail.com
Received: by 10.142.5.24 with SMTP id 24mr5247840wfe.63.1265219300366; Wed, 03 Feb 2010 09:48:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4B69B5AC.1090209@isi.edu>
References: <7BE9742D-6EDC-43FE-84FC-D22C52D23152@nokia.com> <4B69A53E.2050508@isi.edu> <4B69ACD9.1030105@sun.com> <4B69AE64.8070608@isi.edu> <10EDB15A-0DF6-45EE-897C-E38AA611134C@ifi.uio.no> <4B69B030.3000508@isi.edu> <D70C30EF-91E3-4DB6-B0C7-0A6328C77E6A@ifi.uio.no> <4B69B5AC.1090209@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:48:20 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 03c3e252057a2a18
Message-ID: <396556a21002030948s39005503ie8bc96a52b5acb3c@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adam Langley <agl@imperialviolet.org>
To: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Cc: tcpm@ietf.org, Kacheong Poon <kacheong.poon@sun.com>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Subject: Re: [tcpm] TCP tuning
X-BeenThere: tcpm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions Working Group <tcpm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpm>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm>, <mailto:tcpm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:47:50 -0000

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> wrote:
> IMO, I would encourage Google to take their work there and get feedback
> there first. TCPM is a place where mature, vetted ideas should be
> considered, preferably (IMO).

I think an important part of the presentation is that this is already
a very well vetted idea: by using multiple subdomains and concurrent
connections, HTTP has already increased the initcwnd drastically.


AGL

-- 
Adam Langley agl@imperialviolet.org http://www.imperialviolet.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email